Improving Students’ Learning Outcomes Using 5E Learning Cycle Model
Abstract
Quality control of agricultural products is one of the study programs in the vocational school that applies online learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. The implementation of online learning in grade XI quality control has constraints, in which the average learning outcomes are still gaining at a low value of 58.06 in the analysis proximate material. At the time of observation, 70% of students did not understand the topic. Some students get difficulties in discovering or constructing a solution to a problem. Thus, an appropriate learning model is needed to improve student's learning outcomes. The purpose of this study was to determine the implementation of the learning cycle 5E model and discovery learning also to identify the differences in student learning outcomes between both models’ performance in the materials applying fresh milk quality standards. The research was conducted using the quasi-experimental (experiment classes used the learning cycle 5E model and control class used the discovery learning model). This study proved good analysis results. The application of the learning cycle 5E shows better results to the discovery learning model to improve student learning outcomes as evidenced by the fact that the average value of experiment classes is higher than that of the control class. The N-gain value of the experiment class is greater than that of the control class. Therefore, the learning cycle 5E model can improve students' learning outcomes.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Agus, P., Nur, A., Syamsul, H., and Nita, A. (2020). The effects of the ECIRR learning model on mathematical reasoning ability in the curriculum perspective 2013: Integration on student learning motivation. European Journal of Educational Research, 9(2), 675-684.
Althof, W., and Berkowitz, M. W. (2006). Moral education and character education: Their relationship and roles in citizenship education. Journal of Moral Education, 35(4), 495-518.
Bilad, M. R. (2021). Portfolio workbook as an effective method for student-centered learning of chemical engineering principles. ASEAN Journal of Science and Engineering Education, 1(1), 31-36.
Hake, R. R. (1998). Interactive-engagement versus traditional methods: A six-thousand-student survey of mechanics test data for introductory physics courses. American Journal of Physics, 66(1), 64-74.
Jizat, N. A. M., and Sulong, M. S. (2021). Lecturer Perspective on Informal Learning Activities. Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology, 1(1), 23-26.
Novianti, A. (2014). Pengaruh model pembelajaran learning cycle terhadap keterampilan berpikir kritis siswa. Edusains, 6(1), 109-116.
Pratiwi, D. D. (2016). Pembelajaran learning cycle 5E berbantuan geogebra terhadap kemampuan pemahaman konsep matematis. Al-Jabar: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika, 7(2), 191-202.
Rodriguez, S., Allen, K., Harron, J., and Qadri, S. A. (2019). Making and the 5E learning cycle. The Science Teacher, 86(5), 48-55.
Sari, A. K. (2014). Analisis karakteristik gaya belajar vak (visual, auditorial, kinestetik) mahasiswa pendidikan informatika angkatan 2014. Edutic-Scientific Journal of Informatics Education, 1(1). 1-12.
Utari, S., Feranie, S., Aviyanti, L., Sari, I. M., and Hasanah, L. (2013). Application of learning cycle 5e model aided Cmaptools-based media prototype to improve student cognitive learning outcomes. Applied Physics Research, 5(4), 69.
Yeni, N., Suryabayu, E. P., and Handayani, T. (2017). The effect of teaching model ‘learning cycles 5E’toward students’ achievement in learning mathematic at X years class SMA Negeri 1 Banuhampu 2013/2014 Academic Year. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 812(1), 012107.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ajsee.v1i2.33389
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 1970 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.