Discovery Learning Application Using a Rope (Track A Line Idea) to Detect Critical Thinking Skills on Elementary School Students

Trisna Nugraha, Ulfah Samrotul Fuadah, Adila Amalia, Karso Karso

Abstract


The study was conducted to collect preliminary data on the effectiveness of the use of Discovery Learning models using TALI (Track A Line Idea) for students' critical thinking skills in mathematics subjects in class VI geometry material in elementary schools. The purpose of this study is to describe whether the application of Discovery Learning models using TALI can be effective against critical thinking skills students on mathematics subjects in class VI geometry material in elementary schools, with research design referring to the syntax of Discovery Learning models that are the benchmarks in learning design namely, (1) providing stimulus; (2) identify the problem; (3) collecting data; (4) data processing; (5) verification; and (6) make conclusions. This study uses a One-shot Case Study experimental research design. With the subjects of class VI students with a total of 17 students. Data collection is done by tests, observations and questionnaires. The results of this study indicate that the motivation and activities of students in Discovery Learning based on TALI are interpreted in high criteria with a percentage range from 84.12% -88.24%. This indicates that Discovery Learning as constructivism learning provides space for students to actively participate in learning by using group learning design and guided discovery so that students keep paying attention to disciplinary aspects in conducting each stage in learning activities. The results of this study indicate that the motivation and activities of students in Discovery Learning based on TALI are interpreted in high criteria with a percentage range from 84.12% -88.24%. This indicates that Discovery Learning as constructivism learning provides space for students to actively participate in learning by using group learning design and guided discovery so that students keep paying attention to disciplinary aspects in conducting each stage in learning activities. The results of this study indicate that the motivation and activities of students in Discovery Learning based on TALI are interpreted in high criteria with a percentage range from 84.12% -88.24%. This indicates that Discovery Learning as constructivism learning provides space for students to actively participate in learning by using group learning design and guided discovery so that students keep paying attention to disciplinary aspects in conducting each stage in learning activities.


Keywords


Discovery Learning; Critical Thinking Mathematics; Geometry; ROPE; Elementary School Learning.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ausubel, DP (1961). “Learning by discovery: Rationale and mystique”. Bulletin of the National Association of Secondary School Principals, 45, pp. 18-58.

Balim, AG, (2009). The Effects of Discovery Learning on Students' Success and Inquiry Learning Skills. Egitim Arastirmalari-Eurasian Journal of Educational Research, 35(1), pp.1-20.

Bruner, JS (1961). The act of discovery. Harvard Educational Review, 31, 21-32.

Dwyer, CP, Hogan, MJ, & Stewart, I. (2014). An integrated critical thinking framework for the 21st century. Thinking Skills and Creativity, 12, 43–52.

Eggen & Kauchak (2009). Methods of teaching: promoting student learning in K-12 classroom. New Jersey USA: Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Allyn & Bacon.

Ennis, RH (1985). A logical basis for measuring critical thinking skills. Educational leadership, 43(2), 44-48.

Fisher, A. (2000). Book review of critical thinking Robert H. Ennis 1996. Argumentation, 14(1), 48–51.

Hammer, D. (1997). Discovery learning and discovery teaching. Taylor &Francis Group, 15(4), pp. 485-529. Retrieved fromhttp://www.jstor.org/stable/3233776.

Honomichl, RD, and Chen, Z. (2012). The role of guidance in children's discovery learning. John Wiley & Sons, 3, pp. 615-622. Retrieved from: WIREs Cogn Sci 2012, doi: 10.1002/wcs.1199.

Hosnan, M. (2014). Scientific and contextual approach to 21st century learning. (Scientific and contextual approach to 21st century learning). Jakarta: Ghalia Indah

In'am, A., and Hajar, S. (2017). Learning Geometry through Discovery Learning Using a Scientific Approach. International Journal of Instruction, 10 (1), pp. 55-70. e-ISSN: 1308-1470www.e-iji.net.

Joyce, Bruce & Weil. (2009). Models of teaching. New Jersey USA: Pearson Education, Inc., Publishing as Allyn& Bacon

Kirschner, PA, et al. (2006). Why Minimal Guidance During Instruction Does Not Work: An Analysis of the Failure of Constructivist, Discovery, Problem-Based, Experiential, and Inquiry-Based Teaching. Educational psychologist, 41(2), pp.75-86. DOI: 10.1207/s15326985ep4102_1.Retrievedfrom: OAI.https://www.researchgate.net/publication /27699659

Kivunja, C. (2014). Innovative Pedagogies in Higher Education to Become Effective Teachers of 21st Century Skills: Unpacking the Learning and Innovations Skills Domain of the New Learning Paradigm. International Journal of Higher Education, 3, pp.37-48. DOI:http://dx.doi.org/10.5430/ijhe.v3n4p37.

Kivunja, C. (2015a). Exploring the Pedagogical Meaning and Implications of the 4Cs “Super Skills” for the 21st Century through Bruner's 5E Lenses of Knowledge Construction to Improve Pedagogies of the New Learning Paradigm. Creative education, 6(1), pp.224-239.

Kivunja, C. (2015b). Teaching, Learning and Assessment: Steps towards Creative Practice. Melbourne: Oxford University Press.

Lestari, KE & Yudhanegara, MK (2015). Mathematics Education Research. Bandung: PT Refika Aditama

Lieung, KL (2019). The Influence of the Discovery Learning Model on Critical Thinking Skills of Elementary School Students. MUSAMUS: Journal of Primary Education, 1(2), pp.073-082. ISSN: 2622-7819, e-ISSN: 2622-7800.

McPeck, J.E. (2017). Critical thinking and education. Oxford: Martin Robertson & Company Ltd.

Muhammad, N. (2016). The Effect of Discovery Learning Method to Improve Mathematical Representation and Student Confidence. Garut University Journal of Education, 9 (1), pp.9-22.

Oktaviani, W., Kristin, F., and Anugraheni, I. (2018). Application of discovery learning learning model to improve critical thinking skills and mathematics learning outcomes of 5th grade elementary school students. Journal of Basicedu, 2(2), pp.5-10.

Prasasti, DE, Koeswanti, HD, and Giarti, S. (2019). Improvement of critical thinking skills and mathematics learning outcomes through discovery learning models in fourth grade elementary school. Journal of Basicedu, 3(1), pp. 174-179.

Prasetyo, F., and Kristin, F. (2020). The Influence of Problem Based Learning Model and Discovery Learning Model on Critical Thinking Ability of 5th Grade Elementary School Students. Didactics of Tauhidi: Journal of Elementary School Teacher Education, 7(1), pp. 13-27. DOI : 10.30997/dt.v 7i1.2645.

Ramdhani, MR, et al. (2017). "Discovery Learning with Scientific Approach on Geometry". International Conference on Mathematics and Science Education (ICMScE), Journal of Physics: Conf. Series 895 (2017) 012033. doi :10.1088/1742-6596/895/1/012033.

Rotherham, AJ, & Willingham, D. (2009). “21st Century Skills The Challenges Ahead”. Educational Leadership, 67(1), pp. 16–21.

Rudyanto, HE (2014). Discovery learning model with a scientific approach with character to improve creative thinking skills. Premiere Educandum, 4(1), pp.41-48.

Sanjaya, W. (2008). Curriculum and Learning: Theory and practice of curriculum development at the education unit level (KTSP). Jakarta: Prenadamedia Group.

SBAC (2015). Preparing America's Students for College & Career: The Common Core State Standards—A Commitment to Student Success. Washington DC: Smarter Balanced Assessment Consortium. Retrieved from:http://www.svsd410,org/cms/lib05/WA01919490/Centricity/Domain/31/Parent%20CCSS%20Presentation.pdf.

Sugiyono, (2012), Educational research methods. Alphabeta: Bandung.

Supriyanto, B. (2014). The application of discovery learning to improve student learning outcomes in class vi b mathematics subjects the subject of circumference and area of a circle at Tanggul Wetan Elementary School 02 Tanggul District, Jember Regency. Radiant, 3 (2), pp. 165-174.

Susanto, A. (2013). Learning theory and learning in elementary school. Jakarta: Prenamedia Group.

Svinicki, MD (1998). A theoretical foundation for discovery learning. Advances in physiology education the american physiological society, 20 (1), pp.1-4. Retrieved from: www.physiology.org/journal/advances (103.023.244.254) on October 9, 2019.

Tapscott, D. (2009). Grown up Digital: How the Net Generation Is Changing Your World. New York: McGraw-Hill.

Tuovinen, JE, and Sweller, J. (1999). A Comparison of Cognitive Load Associated With Discovery Learning and Worked Examples. Journal of Educational Psychology, 91(2), pp.334-341.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijpe.v4i2.25087

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Indonesian Journal of Primary Education



This Journal is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License. 
©Indonesian Journal of Primary Education. ISSN: 2597-4866 (Online) dan 2599-2821 (Print).


Jalan Dadaha Nomor 18 Kota Tasikmalaya

Telepon (0265) 331860

Homepage http://pgsd-tasikmalaya.upi.edu/

Email pgsd_tasik@upi.edu