PENGARUH MOTIVASI DAN IKLIM KERJA TERHADAP KUALITAS MENGAJAR DOSEN

Erlani Pertiwi, aan Komariah, dedy achmad kurniady

Abstract


This research aims to determine the effect of work motivation and work climate on the quality of teaching lecturers. The method used in this research is a descriptive method with a quantitative approach, a sample of 63 lecturers at Fakultas Tarbiyah and Keguruan UIN Suska Riau. Data was collected using a questionnaire with a Likert scale model and data was analyzed using simple regression analysis, multiple regression, partial correlation and correlation coefficient of determination. The results shown that: (1) The amount of influence of work motivation on the quality of teaching lecturers obtained results of 0.674 (strong correlation), while the effect was 41%. The research hypothesis shown that "work motivation has a significant effect on the quality of teaching lecturers" is accepted. (2) The amount of work climate influence on the quality of teaching obtainedresults of 0.681 (strong correlation) and the effect of 36%. The research hypothesis can be concluded that "work climate has a significant effect on the quality of teaching lecturers" can be accepted. (3) The influence of motivation and work climate on the quality of teaching obtained results of 0.743 (strong correlation) with the influence of 45% and the remaining 55% was influenced by other factors. Based on these results, it can be concluded that the research hypothesis which states "work motivation and work climate have a significant effect on the quality of teaching lecturers" can be accepted.

Keywords


teaching quality, work climate, work motivation.

References


Akdon. 2008. Aplikasi Statistika dan Metode Penelitian untuk Administrasi dan Manajemen. Bandung: Dewa Ruchi.

Hanifah, Nanang dan Cucu, Suhana. 2009. Konsep Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: PT. Refika Aditama.

Hoy, Wayne.K & C.C. Miskel, 2001. Educational Administration: Theory, Research and Practice. New York: McGraw-Hill Book.

Shield, J. 2007. Managing Employee Performance and Reward. New York: Cambridge University Press.

Wlodkowski, R.J. 2008. Enhancing Adult Motivation to Learn. San Fransisco: Jossey-Bass.

Husaini. 2017. Pengaruh Profesional Dosen Terhadap Kualitas Pembelajaran Dosen Agama Islam Di Fakultas Keguruan Ilmu Pendidikan Universitas Pattimura. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan, Keguruan dan Pembelajaran, 1 (1), hlm. 9-16.

Houlfort, N. et al. 2002. The Impact of Performance-Contingent Rewards on Perceived Autonomy and Competence. Jurnal Motivation and Emotion, 26 (4), hlm. 279-295.

Maheswari, Hesti. 2013. Analisis Perbandingan Kepuasan Mahasiswa Terhadap Kualitas Proses Belajar Mengajar Dosen Tetap Dengan Dosen Tidak Tetap Pada Universitas Mercu Buana. Jurnal SWOT, 6 (1), hlm. 1-13.

Muhardi & Arinto Nurcahyono. 2011. “Pengaruh Tunjangan terhadap Produkvitas Dosen dalam Menghasilakn Karya Ilmiah dan Penelitian”. dalam Prosiding Sosial, Ekonomi dan Humaniora 2 (1), hlm.104.

Undang- Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 20 Tahun 2003 Tentang Sistem Pendidikan Nasional.

Undang- Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 12 Tahunh 2012 Tentang Pendidikan Tinggi

Undang- Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 14 Tahun 2005 Tentang Guru Dan Dosen.

Undang- Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 9 Tahun 1995 Tentang Iklim Kerja.

Peraturan Pemerintah Republik Indonesia Nomor 37 Tahun 2009 Tentang Dosen.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v26i2.20928

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan



ISSN: p.1412-8152 e.2580-1007
Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan is issued by Program Studi Administrasi Pendidikan Sekolah Pascasarjana Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
free hit counter
View My Stats