Discourse in curriculum: A focus on film, television, and media studies

Firdaus Noor; Nuril Ashivah Misbah; Dede Suprayitno; Putrawan Yuliandri

doi:10.17509/jik.v21i2.67536

Discourse in curriculum: A focus on film, television, and media studies

Firdaus Noor, Nuril Ashivah Misbah, Dede Suprayitno, Putrawan Yuliandri

Abstract

This article using discourse theory, popularized by Foucault, is used to examine the production and use of knowledge and practices relevant to the discourse that applies to the film, television, and media studies study program curriculum. This research uses the interpretive phenomenology method (Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis), and the classification and framing of data are carried out through focused group discussions. The purposeful sampling technique was chosen through a maximum variation sampling strategy involving eight research subjects to understand the various experiences of campuses that already have similar programs and are considered the most "oriented" stakeholders. The result is that the curriculum discourse produces four themes: scientific vision and mission, graduate profile, learning outcomes, and curriculum structure. In the experience model, participants express discourse themes with actual social reality. In the end, how discourse speaks is expected to be a critical dimension in forming the Film, Television, and Media Studies program curriculum.

Abstrak

Artikel ini menggunakan teori Diskursus yang dipopulerkan oleh Foucault digunakan dengan tujuan untuk melihat produksi dan penggunaan pengetahuan dan praktiknya yang relevansinya dengan wacana yang berlaku untuk kurikulum prodi kajian film, televisi, dan media. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode fenomenologi interpretatif (Interpretative Phenomenological Analysis), klasifikasi dan pembingkaian data dilakukan melalui kegiatan diskusi terpumpun/Focus Group Discussion. Teknik purposeful sampling dipilih melalui strategi maximal variation sampling dengan melibatkan delapan subjek penelitian untuk memahami beragam pengalaman dari kampus-kampus yang sudah memiliki program serupa dan dianggap paling "berorientasi" sebagai pemangku kepentingan. Hasilnya bahwa diskursus kurikulum menghasilkan empat tema yaitu visi misi keilmuan, profil lulusan, capaian pembelajaran, dan struktur kurikulum. Model pengalaman, partisipan mengungkapkan tema wacana dengan realitas sosial yang sesungguhnya. Pada akhirnya cara diskursus berbicara diharapkan menjadi dimensi kunci dalam pembentukan kurikulum pada program studi Kajian Film, Televisi, dan Media.

Kata Kunci: Diskursus kurikulum; fenomenologi interpretatif; foucault; kajian film, televisi, dan media

Keywords

Discourse curriculum; film, television, and media Studies; foucault; interpretative phenomenology

Full Text:

Download PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Alhayat, A., & Arifin, Z. (2023). Evaluation of science curriculum: A literature study. Inovasi Kurikulum, 20(2), 239-250.

Allmer, T. (2019). Academic labour, digital media and capitalism. Critical Sociology, 45(4-5), 599-615.

Antoni, D., Herdiansyah, M. I., Akbar, M., & Sumitro, A. (2021). Pengembangan infrastruktur jaringan untuk meningkatkan pelayanan publik di Kota Palembang. Jurnal Media Informatika Budidarma, 5(4), 52-59.

Arefin, M. A., Nabi, M. N., Sadeque, S., & Gudimetla, P. (2021). Incorporating sustainability in engineering curriculum: a study of the Australian universities. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 22(3), 576-598.

Arifin, A. (2021). Diskursus kurikulum pendidikan islam, konsep dan implementasinya. Journal of Islamic Education Research, 2(1), 87-104.

Ball, S. J. (2019). A horizon of freedom: Using Foucault to think differently about education and learning. Power and Education, 11(2), 132-144.

Batubara, T. (2020). Memutar sejarah “Gambar Idoep” masa silam: Industri perfilman dan dampaknya di Medan pada era Kolonial Belanda sampai orde baru. Warisan: Journal of History and Cultural Heritage, 1(1), 14-19.

Baxter, J., Cepeda, A., & McLean, H. (2020). Experiencing education through film: Behind the scenes of the CIES film festivalette. Comparative Education Review, 6(4), 780-788.

Bell, A., Potter, S., Morris, L.-A., Strbac, M., Grundy, A., & Yawary, M. Z. (2019). Evaluating the process and product of a student-staff partnership for curriculum redesign in film studies. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 6(2), 40-50.

Bora, A. (2020). Cinema as a tool for health and risk communication: Issues and challenges. Global Media Journal-Indian Edition, 12(2), 1-13.

Drianus, O. (2021). The existential-spiritual of development of elderly: Thematic review & Islamic interpretation of Al-Ashr. Counselle Journal of Islamic Guidance and Counseling, 1(1), 1-19.

Fedorov, A., & Levitskaya, A. (2022). Theoretical concepts of film studies in cinema art journal: 1945-1955. International Journal of Media and Information Literacy, 7(1), 71-109.

Fetricia, F., Soekamto, H., Soelistijo, D., & Utomo, D. H. (2023). Model problem based learning berbantuan video berita: Pengaruhnya terhadap kemampuan berpikir kritis pada siswa SMA. Jurnal Integrasi dan Harmoni Inovatif Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial, 3(7), 741-752.

Fitria, T. N. (2023). Augmented reality (AR) and virtual reality (VR) technology in education: Media of teaching and learning: A review. International Journal of Computer and Information System (IJCIS), 4(1), 14-25.

Fussalam, Y. E., Lestari, R., & Anggelia, R. Y. (2019). A study of listening skills through movie: a review of the current literature. Journal of Language Education and Development (JLed), 1(2), 158-168.

Gilmour, P. M. (2023). Enhancing research collaboration within a large university department. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 10(2), 1-14.

Heuberger, R. (2020). Monolingual online dictionaries for learners of English and the opportunities of the electronic medium: A Critical Survey. International Journal of Lexicography, 33(4), 404-416.

Hidayatullah, R. (2022). Desain penelitian musik di era digital (sebuah tinjauan studi literatur). Virtuoso: Jurnal Pengkajian dan Penciptaan Musik, 5(1), 28-40.

Iversen, S. M., & WILINska, M. O. N. I. K. A. (2020). Ageing, old age and media: Critical appraisal of knowledge practices in academic research. International Journal of Ageing and Later Life, 14(1), 121-149.

Jasminka, K., & Ristevska, M. (2020). Development of effective critical thinking among students through social work education. International Journal of Education-Teacher, 10(19), 31-39.

Justin, E., & Supratiknya, A. (2023). Reorientasi program profesi psikologi. Suksma: Jurnal Psikologi Universitas Sanata Dharma, 4(1), 84-106.

Kuswoyo, H., & Rido, A. (2019). Process types of transitivity system in engineering lecture introduction: A pedagogic discourse. Lingua: Jurnal Bahasa dan Sastra, 19(2), 85-96.

Mattioni, F. C., Nakata, P. T., Dresh, L. C., Rollo, R., Brochier, L. S. B., & Rocha, C. F. (2021). Health promotion practices and Michel Foucault: A scoping review. American Journal of Health Promotion, 35(6), 45-52.

Moosavinia, S. R., Racevskis, K., & Talebi, S. (2019). Edward Said and Michel Foucault: Representation of the notion of discourse in colonial discourse theory. Journal of Research in Applied Linguistics, 10(2), 182-197.

Nunn, C. (2020). Film (making) education for all? British cultural policy and film education. Film Education Journal, 3(2), 1-12.

Nurmansyah, G. R. (2023). Analysis of nationalism in kurikulum merdeka. Inovasi Kurikulum, 20(1), 105-116.

Nushur, R. D., & Astutie, D. D. (2021). Producing documentary film as a project on project based learning approach in improving critical thinking. JESS (Journal of Education on Social Science), 5(1), 11-23.

Pillay, P. (2019). Curriculum design: reflections on the design of the curriculum for intermediate phase students at a rural-based comprehensive university with special reference to English Language education modules. Gender and Behaviour, 17(1), 12493-12505.

Rajib, M. S. U. (2021). A Review on Michel Foucault in accounting research. The Jahangirnagar Journal of Business Studies, 10(1), 77-92.

Reniwati, R., & Khanizar, K. (2022). Leksikon nama peralatan rumah tangga masyarakat Minangkabau: Gambaran dinamika masyarakat. Ranah: Jurnal Kajian Bahasa, 11(1), 141-152.

Rose, J., Malik, K., Hirata, E., Roughan, H., Aston, K., & Larkin, M. (2019). Is it possible to use interpretative phenomenological analysis in research with people who have intellectual disabilities?. Journal of Applied Research in Intellectual Disabilities, 13(2), 7-17.

Silalahi, H., Widiastuti, M., Sari, A. N. P., & Nababan, D. (2021). Desain pengembangan kurikulum prodi Teologi dalam upaya menghasilkan lulusan berdasarkan kebutuhan jemaat. Syntax Literate ; Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia, 6(2), 61-68.

Simanjuntak, M. B., Barus, I. R. G., & Resmayasari, I. (2021). Analysis of Violence in City of God film directed by Fernando Meirelles. Journal of Advanced English Studies, 4(1), 1-6.

Spatioti, A. G., Kazanidis, I., & Pange, J. (2022). A comparative study of the ADDIE instructional design model in distance education. Information, 13(9), 1-20.

Stentiford, L., & Koutsouris, G. (2021). What are inclusive pedagogies in higher education? A systematic scoping review. Studies in Higher Education, 6(1), 245-261.

Sudarmo, S., Arifin, A., Pattiasina, P. J., Wirawan, V., & Aslan, A. (2021). The future of instruction media in indonesian education: Systematic review. Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Pendidikan, 13(2), 1302-1311.

Tandi, S. (2019). Postmodern thinkers and higher education: A Sociological Study. International Journal of All Research Writings, 2(2), 22-33.

Tumangkeng, S. Y. L., & Maramis, J. B. (2022). Kajian pendekatan fenomenologi: Literature review. Jurnal Pembangunan Ekonomi dan Keuangan Daerah, 23(1), 14-32.

Wijaya Mulya, T., & Aditomo, A. (2019). Researching religious tolerance education using discourse analysis: A case study from Indonesia. British Journal of Religious Education, 14(4), 446-457.

Wong, A., Ho, S., Olusanya, O., Antonini, M. V., & Lyness, D. (2021). The use of social media and online communications in times of pandemic COVID-19. Journal of the Intensive Care Society, 22(3), 255-260.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i2.67536