Evaluation of the project for strengthening the Profil Pelajar Pancasila

Mutiara Eka Betari; R. Rusman

doi:10.17509/jik.v21i3.71960

Evaluation of the project for strengthening the Profil Pelajar Pancasila

Mutiara Eka Betari, R. Rusman

Abstract

Basic education plays a crucial role in forming students' character and competencies. The Merdeka Curriculum in Elementary Schools carries out the Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) to instill Pancasila values and develop students into lifelong learners with character. Evaluation of the achievement of P5 is essential to ensure its effectiveness and identify areas for improvement. This research aims to evaluate the achievement of P5 in Elementary Schools using the CIPP Model. This research uses a descriptive evaluation method with data collected through interviews, observation, document study and questionnaires. The results of the context evaluation show that the curriculum at SDPN 252 Setiabudi, Bandung City follows the principles of Kurikulum Merdeka, providing freedom in adapting learning and integrating Pancasila values. Input evaluation shows that facilities are adequate, but several deficiencies need to be corrected. Teachers need additional training to understand the development of project modules. Process evaluation shows that the implementation of P5 is going well, but there are obstacles related to the lack of timeliness and coordination of the Expo-Project, requiring better planning. Product evaluation shows that P5 has succeeded in developing positive student behavior and awareness of Pancasila values.

Abstrak

Pendidikan dasar berperan krusial dalam membentuk karakter dan kompetensi peserta didik. Kurikulum Merdeka di Sekolah Dasar mengusung Proyek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila (P5) untuk menanamkan nilai-nilai Pancasila dan mengembangkan peserta didik menjadi pembelajar sepanjang hayat yang berkarakter. Evaluasi ketercapaian P5 menjadi esensial untuk memastikan efektivitasnya dan mengidentifikasi area perbaikan. Tujuan penelitian ini adalah mengevaluasi ketercapaian P5 di Sekolah Dasar menggunakan Model CIPP. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode evaluasi deskriptif dengan data yang dikumpulkan melalui wawancara, observasi, studi dokumen, dan angket. Hasil evaluasi konteks menunjukkan kurikulum di SDPN 252 Setiabudi Kota Bandung sesuai dengan prinsip Kurikulum Merdeka, memberikan kebebasan dalam adaptasi pembelajaran dan integrasi nilai-nilai Pancasila. Evaluasi input menunjukkan fasilitas memadai, namun beberapa kekurangan perlu diperbaiki. Guru membutuhkan pelatihan tambahan untuk memahami pengembangan modul proyek. Evaluasi proses menunjukkan pelaksanaan P5 berjalan baik, tetapi ada hambatan terkait ketidaktepatan waktu dan koordinasi Expo-Project, memerlukan perencanaan yang lebih baik. Evaluasi produk menunjukkan P5 berhasil mengembangkan perilaku positif peserta didik dan kesadaran akan nilai-nilai Pancasila.

Kata Kunci: CIPP; evaluasi proyek pembelajaran; P5; sekolah dasar

Keywords

CIPP; elementary school; learning project evaluation; P5

Full Text:

Download PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)

References

Abdallah, M. (2020). Evaluation of the curriculum of english preparatory classes at Yildiz Technical University using CIPP model. Educational Research and Reviews, 11(7), 466-473.

Ahmad, I., & Hassan, F. (2022). Evaluating the impact of curriculum reforms on student learning outcomes: a case study of Indonesian schools. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 12(3), 214-228.

Arifin, M. Z. (2023). Strategi pendidikan Pancasila dalam membentuk nilai-nilai kebangsaan pada anak usia dini. Al-Mikraj: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora, 4(1), 42-50.

Arusliadi, A. (2022). Implementasi gerakan literasi sekolah melalui taman baca di SMA Negeri 7 Banjarmasin. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 2(2), 148-154.

Berkowitz, M. W., Battistich, V. A., & Bier, M. C. (2020). Educating for positive youth development through character education. Journal of Character Education, 16(1), 45-60.

Braun, V., & Clarke, V. (2006). Using thematic analysis in psychology. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 3(2), 77-101.

Brown, C., & Jones, D. (2021). The role of descriptive evaluation in educational assessment. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 29(3), 315-330.

Bush, T., & Glover, D. (2020). The role of teacher training in educational quality improvement: A review of the literature. Journal of Education for Teaching, 46(4), 479-492.

Chen, Y., Wang, Q., & Li, L. (2020). Process evaluation in education program using the CIPP model. Journal of Educational Evaluation, 17(1), 85-98.

Dewi, M. R. (2022). Kelebihan dan kekurangan project-based learning untuk penguatan profil pelajar pancasila kurikulum merdeka. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2), 213-226.

Garet, M. S., Porter, A. C., Desimone, L., Birman, B. F., & Yoon, K. S. (2001). What makes professional development effective? Results from a national sample of teachers. American Educational Research Journal, 38(4), 915-945.

Humaerah, P. D., Mukminan, M., & Sari, J, Y. (2020). Teacher’s roles on the implementation of character education in elementary schools. International Conference on Social Science and Character Educations, 1, 24-29.

Johnson, B. (2020). Methods of descriptive analysis in educational evaluation. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 33(1), 78-92.

Kennedy, M. M. (2016). How does professional development improve teaching?. Review of Educational Research, 86(4), 945-980.

Kusumawardani, M. G., & Handayaningrum, W. (2023). Go school literacy program evaluation through CIPP model in SMP Hang Tuah Excellent Juanda. Pedagogia, 21(1), 57-66.

Kusumawati, D., & Santoso, B. (2023). The role of teacher training in the implementation of the merdeka curriculum in primary schools. International Journal of Educational Development, 39(1), 87-99.

Liu, H., & Wang, G. (2021). Input evaluation in educational programs: A review using the CIPP model. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(1), 65-80.

Ngereja, B., Hussein, B., Andersen, B. (2020). Does Project-Based Learning (PBL) promote student learning? A performance evaluation. Education Sciences, 10(11), 2-15.

Niehues, L. (2020). A comprehensive approach to character education: Nemaha central elementary and middle school. Journal of Character Education, 16(2), 27-31.

Nugraha, T. S. (2022). Kurikulum merdeka untuk pemulihan krisis pembelajaran. Inovasi Kurikulum, 19(2), 251-262.

Nugroho, A., & Pratama, R. (2022). Enhancing critical thinking skills through project-based learning: Insights from Indonesian elementary schools. Asia-Pacific Journal of Teacher Education, 30(2), 150-164.

Nurhayati, W. (2021). Evaluasi kinerja guru dalam peningkatan mutu pendidikan di Indonesia. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 6(1), 55-65.

Prasetyo, A. (2021). Pengembangan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan kreatif melalui pendidikan karakter berbasis Pancasila. Jurnal Pendidikan Karakter, 13(1), 45-58.

Sari, M., & Putri, Y. (2023). Assessing the effectiveness of character education in primary schools: A longitudinal study. Journal of Moral Education, 35(4), 205-218.

Setiawan, A., & Wulandari, D. (2021). Fleksibilitas dalam kurikulum merdeka: Tinjauan teoritis dan empiris. Jurnal Kurikulum dan Pembelajaran, 18(1), 50-60.

Setiawan, H. (2023). Kolaborasi dan kerja sama sebagai indikator profil pelajar Pancasila. Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kebudayaan, 16(1), 75-89.

Smith, A. (2019). Descriptive evaluation methods in educational research. Journal of Educational Research, 45(2), 210-225.

Wulandari, S., & Hidayat, N. (2022). The implementation of digital tools in enhancing teaching and learning processes: Evidence from Indonesian schools. Computers and Education, 45(6), 133-148.

Yuwono, I. (2017). CIPP evaluation at school providing inclusive education at elementary school. Journal of ICSAR, 1(2), 126-130.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i3.71960