Analysis of Public Accounting Firm Services and Audit Quality with Structure Conduct Performance Approach in Indonesia Capital Market
Abstract
Abstract. The business aspect of the audit services may lead to abnormal fee audits. This happens because the supply and demand in audit services are unbalanced resulting in an oligopolistic market, in which the audit engagement is concentrated in several public accounting firms. Such market concentration will lead to the structure conduct performance paradigm because the market structure of an industry will cause behavioral changes especially in the determination of reasonable audit fees and will ultimately affect the quality of audit services itself. This study aims to 1) test and analyze the direct effect of audit service market concentration on audit quality in Indonesia capital market; 2) test and analyze the indirect effect of audit service market concentration on audit quality through positive abnormal audit fee in Indonesian capital market. The research was conducted using a quantitative descriptive method. Research data is in the form of secondary data from capital market in Indonesia. The results show that market concentration has not an effect on the decreased audit quality,but market concentrationhasan effect on increase abnormal fee.
Keywords: market structure; audit fee; audit quality
Abstrak. Aspek bisnis dari layanan audit dapat menyebabkan audit biaya tidak normal. Hal ini terjadi karena pasokan dan permintaan dalam layanan audit tidak seimbang yang mengakibatkan pasar oligopolistik, di mana keterlibatan audit terkonsentrasi di beberapa kantor akuntan publik. Konsentrasi pasar seperti itu akan mengarah pada struktur melakukan paradigma kinerja karena struktur pasar suatu industri akan menyebabkan perubahan perilaku terutama dalam penentuan biaya audit yang wajar dan pada akhirnya akan mempengaruhi kualitas layanan audit itu sendiri. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk 1) menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh langsung konsentrasi pasar layanan audit terhadap kualitas audit di pasar modal Indonesia; 2) menguji dan menganalisis pengaruh tidak langsung konsentrasi pasar layanan audit terhadap kualitas audit melalui biaya audit abnormal yang positif di pasar modal Indonesia. Penelitian ini dilakukan dengan menggunakan metode deskriptif kuantitatif. Data penelitian berupa data sekunder dari pasar modal di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa konsentrasi pasar tidak berpengaruh pada penurunan kualitas audit, tetapi konsentrasi pasar berpengaruh pada peningkatan biaya abnormal.
Kata Kunci: struktur pasar; biaya audit; kualitas auditKeywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afriansyah & Siregar ,(2007) Konsentrasi Pasar Audit di Indonesia (Anaisis Empiris di Pasar Modal Indonesia). Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 10
Bain (1969) Industrial Organization
Becker et al (1998). The effect of audit quality on earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 15(1),1–24.
Blankley et al (2012). Abnormal Audit Fees and Restatement. Auditing : A Journal of Practice & Theory Vol 31 Issue 1 P 79-96
Campa (2013). “Big 4 fee premium” and audit quality: latest evidence from UK listed companies. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 28 Iss 8 pp. 680 - 707
Choi et al (2010) Audit Office Size, Audit Quality and Audit Pricing. Working Paper. Singapore Management University
DeFond & Jiambalvo (1993). Factors related to auditor–client disagreements over incomeincreasing accounting methods. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(2), 415–431.
Eshleman (2013) The Effect Of Audit Market Concentration On Audit Pricing And Audit Quality : The Role Of The Size Of The Audit Market. A Dissertation B.S North Carolina State University
Ettredge et al (2014). Fee pressure and audit quality. Accounting, Organizations and Society 39 (2014) 247–263
Fan & Wong (2005). Do external auditors perform a corporate governance role in emerging markets?evidence from east asia
Fitriany et al (2016). Impact of Abnormal Audit Fee To Audit Quality : Indonesian Case Study. American Journal Of Economic 6(1); 72-78
Francis et al (1999). The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 18(2), 17–34.
Francis (2004). What do we know about audit quality?. The British Accounting Review 36 (2004) 345-368.
Hay et al (2006). Audit Fees : A Meta Analysis of The Effect of Supply-Demand
Hoitash et al (2007). Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, Vol. 22 Iss 8 pp. 761 – 786
Houqe et al (2015). Corporate ethics and auditor choice – international evidence. Research in Accounting Regulation 27 (2015) 57–65
Huang et al (2016). Audit market concertation, audit fee and audit quality : evidence from china
Jaggi & Low (2011). Joint Effect of Investor Protection and Securities Regulations on Audit Fees. The International Journal of Accounting 46 (2011) 241–270
Kothari et al (2005).Performance Matched Discretionary Accrual Measure.
Kraub et al (2015) Abnormal Audit Fees and Audit Quality : Initial Evidence
Lee & Park (2013). Subjectivity in fair value estimates, audit quality and in formativeness of other comprehensive income. Advance in Accounting, incorporating advances in international accounting 29 (2013) 218-231
Lowensohn et.al (2007). Auditor specialization, perceived audit quality, and audit fees in the local government audit market. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26, 705–732
Rahmina & Agoes (2014).Influence of auditor independence, audit tenure, and audit fee on audit quality of members of capital market accountant forum in Indonesia. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences 164 ( 2014 ) 324 – 331
Viska et al (2013). Pengaruh Persaingan Pasar Jasa Audit Terhadap Kualitas Audit Peranan Regulasi Rotasi dan Regulasi Corporate Governance. Simposium Nasional Akuntansi 15
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v6i1.13697
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats