Usulan Rancangan Perumusan Opini Audit Internal Pada Kegiatan Audit Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah
Abstract
Abstract. The research proposed to provide input to the Government Internal Supervisory Apparatus or Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) on the importance of the application of internal audit opinion, analyze the perceptions of auditors, auditors, and users of the internal audit opinion opinion applied, and use the formulation of internal audit opinions in accordance with the results of APIP audit reports . Case studies use case study methods with qualitative methods. The object of research is five APIP units for audit, and one unit of research results for APIP audits. The research data was obtained from primary and secondary data through documentation and interviews. This research shows that the public sector internal audit opinion is needed to move towards APIP level 4 capability of the Internal Audit Capability (IA-CM) capability. According to auditor perceptions, internal opinion audits through the process of planning and carrying out internal audits with professional competence and accuracy, will produce a quality and objective opinion. According to the auditee's perception, the internal audit opinion is a part of the organization and an assessment of the unit's performance improvement. According to the perception of users of the report, internal audits have an influence on the decision-making process. This study proposes the identification of measurement criteria for each governance arrangement, risk management, and organizational control in the administrative field that is appropriate for public sector internal audit opinion formulation. This research also discusses opinions that are in accordance with the needs of auditors, auditors, and users of opinion reports with three or four levels, which can be applied properly at the micro or macro level.
Keywords. Internal audit; public sector; internal audit opinion; APIP; IA-CM.
Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan masukan kepada Aparat Pengawasan Intern Pemerintah (APIP) atas pentingnya penerapan opini audit internal, menganalisis persepsi auditor, auditi, dan pengguna laporan jika opini audit internal diterapkan, dan mengusulkan rancangan perumusan opini audit internal yang tepat pada laporan hasil audit APIP. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan studi kasus dengan metode kualitatif. Objek penelitian adalah lima unit APIP beserta auditinya, dan satu unit pengguna laporan hasil audit APIP. Data penelitian diperoleh dari data primer dan sekunder melalui dokumentasi dan wawancara. Penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa opini audit internal sektor publik sangat diperlukan untuk melangkah menuju kapabilitas APIP level 4 Internal Audit Capability Model (IA-CM). Menurut persepsi auditor, pemberian opini audit internal melalui proses tahapan perencanaan dan pelaksanaan audit internal dengan kompetensi dan kecermatan profesional, akan menghasilkan opini yang bermutu dan objektif. Menurut persepsi auditi, opini audit internal merupakan penilaian bagi organisasi dan membawa dampak terhadap peningkatan kinerja unit. Menurut persepsi pengguna laporan, opini audit internal memberikan pengaruh terhadap proses pengambilan keputusan. Penelitian ini mengusulkan pengidentifikasian kriteria pengukuruan untuk setiap lingkup tata kelola, manajemen risiko, dan pengendalian organisasi di pemerintahan yang sesuai bagi perumusan opini audit internal sektor publik. Penelitian ini juga mengusulkan bentuk opini yang sesuai dengan kebutuhan auditor, auditi, dan pengguna laporan berupa opini dengan tiga atau empat tingkat, yang dapat diterapkan baik di level mikro maupun makro.
Kata kunci. Audit internal; sektor publik; opini audit internal; APIP; IA-CM.
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Afrizal. (2016). Metode Penelitian Kualitatif: Sebuah Upaya Mendukung Penggunaan Penelitian Kualitatif dalam Berbagai Disiplin Ilmu (1st ed.). Jakarta: Rajawali Pers.
Asosiasi Auditor Intern Pemerintah Indonesia. (2013). Standar Audit Intern Pemerintah Indonesia. Jakarta.
Badan Pengawasan Keuangan dan Pembangunan. (2018). Perkembangan Kapabilitas APIP , Maturitas SPIP , Implementasi SIMDA Perencanaan dan Siskeudes. Retrieved from http://www.bpkp.go.id/public/upload/unit/pusat/files/Materi Deputi PKD.pdf
Bovens, M. (2003). Public Accountability. In and C. P. Ewan Ferlie, Laurence E. Lynn Jr. (Ed.), The EGPA Annual Conference. The Oxford Handbook of Public Management, Oxford: Oxford University Press.
Cabinet, N. S. W. D. of P. and, & Government, N. S. W. D. of P. and C. D. of L. (2010). Internal Audit Guidelines [electronic resource] / Department of Premier and Cabinet, Divison of Local Government (N. S. W. D. of P. and Cabinet & N. S. W. D. of P. and C. D. of L. Government, eds.). Retrieved from http://nla.gov.au/nla.arc-124705
Creswell, J. W. (2009). Research Design: Qualitative, Quantitative, and Mixed Approaches (3rd ed.). Thousand Oaks, California: Sage Publications, Inc.
HM Treasury. (2010). Good Practice Guidance: reporting. Retrieved from https://assets.publishing.service.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/207220/Good_practice_guidance_reporting.pdf
Kementerian Keuangan. (2016). Itjen Kemenkeu Menjadi Salah Satu APIP di Level-3. Retrieved from https://www.kemenkeu.go.id/publikasi/berita/itjen-kemenkeu-menjadi-salah-satu-apip-di-level-3/
Kementerian Keuangan. (2017). Keputusan Menteri Keuangan Nomor 940/KMK.09/2017 tentang Kerangka Kerja Penerapan Pengendalian Intern dan Pedoman Pemantauan Pengendalian Intern di Lingkungan Kementerian Keuangan (p. 114). p. 114. Indonesia.
Pickett, K. H. S. (2010). The Internal Auditing Handbook (3 ed.). West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
Pitt, S. A. (2014). Internal Audit Quality: Developing a Quality Assurance and Improvement Program. New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2004). Undang-Undang Nomor 15 Tahun 2004 tentang Pemeriksaan Pengelolaan dan Tanggung Jawab Keuangan Negara (pp. 1–25). pp. 1–25. Indonesia: Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia.
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2010). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 81 Tahun 2010 tentang Grand Design Reformasi Birokrasi 2010 – 2025. Retrieved from https://www.atrbpn.go.id/Publikasi/Peraturan-Perundangan/Peraturan-Presiden/peraturan-presiden-nomor-81-tahun-2010-1185
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2015a). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 2 Tahun 2015 tentang Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Menengah Nasional Tahun 2015-2019. Retrieved from https://www.djkn.kemenkeu.go.id/pug/assets/files/informasi//Perpres-Nomor-2-Tahun-2015.pdf
Presiden Republik Indonesia. (2015b). Peraturan Presiden Nomor 7 Tahun 2015 tentang Organisasi Kementerian Negara. Retrieved from http://kelembagaan.ristekdikti.go.id/wp-content/uploads/2017/01/12687128986.pdf
Rezaee, Z. (2010). The Importance of Internal Audit Opinions: as their role expands, many auditors are providing opinions on governance, risk management, and internal control. Internal Auditor, 67(2), 47–51. Retrieved from http://go.galegroup.com/ps/anonymous?id=GALE%7CA225075496&sid=googleScholar&v=2.1&it=r&linkaccess=abs&issn=00205745&p=AONE&sw=w
Sawyer, L. B., Dittenhofer, M. A., & Scheiner, J. H. (2003). The Practice of Modern Internal Auditing. Retrieved from https://trove.nla.gov.au/work/15028631?selectedversion=NBD25138106
Sekretariat Kabinet Republik Indonesia. (2015). Buka Rakornas Pengawasan, Presiden Jokowi Minta Mekanisme Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Disederhanakan. Retrieved February 28, 2019, from https://setkab.go.id/buka-rakornas-pengawasan-presiden-jokowi-minta-mekanisme-pengadaan-barangjasa-disederhanakan/
Suharso. (2016). Analisis Penerapan Opini Audit Intern Sektor Publik (Studi Kasus Pada Inspektorat Jenderal Kementerian Keuangan) (Universitas Indonesia). Retrieved from http://lib.ui.ac.id/detail?id=20454095&lokasi=lokal
Taylor, S. J., Bogdan, R., & DeVault, M. L. (2016). Qualitative Research Methods: A Giudebook and Resource. Hoboken, New Jersey: John Wiley & Sons Inc.
The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2009a). Formulating and Expressing Internal Audit Opinions, The Institute of Internal Auditors Practice Guide. Retrieved from https://na.theiia.org/standards-guidance/recommended-guidance/practice-guides/pages/formulating-and-expressing-internal-audit-opinions-practice-guide.aspx
The Institute of Internal Auditors. (2009b). Internal Audit Capability Model (IA-CM) For the Public Sector. Retrieved from https://na.theiia.org/iiarf/Public Documents/Internal Audit Capability Model IA-CM for the Public Sector Overview.pdf
Yin, R. K. (2009). Case Study Research: Design and Methods (4th ed., Vol. 5). Retrieved from http://cemusstudent.se/wp-content/uploads/2012/02/YIN_K_ROBERT-1.pdf%5CnISBN 978-1-412296099-1
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v7i2.17241
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats