PENGARUH POLITICAL CONNECTION, FOREIGN ACTIVITY, DAN, REAL EARNINGS MANAGEMENT TERHADAP TAX AVOIDANCE
Abstract
Abstract. This research is aimed to provide empirical evidence about relationship between political connection, foreign activity, and real earnings management on tax avoidance. Hanlon & Heitzman (2010) defines tax avoidance as a continuum tax planning strategis to reduce the explicit taxes. Using purposive sampling, this research selects manufacturing companies that are listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) in the period 2010-2015 as samples. Selected company data amounted to 65, so the total observation in this study are 365 firm-years. The data examination in this study uses multiple regression analysis with dated panel.
The results of this study indicate that real earnings management has no significant effect on tax avoidance. These results mean that real earnings management conducted by the company can not detect tax avoidance activities undertaken by manufacturing firms in IDX. Meanwhile, political connections have a significant positive effect on tax avoidance, meaning that the average company uses its political connections to lower tax payments. Furthermore, a branch or subsidiary-like company can be used by companies to avoid more taxes by utilizing foreign activities stick to them to reduce taxes through profit shifting schemes as well as profit holding as evidenced by a significant positive effect.
Keywords: earnings management; foreign activity; political connection; tax avoidance.
Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris terkait hubungan antara koneksi politik, aktivitas luar negeri, dan manajemen laba riil terhadap praktik penghindaran pajak. Hanlon & Heitzman (2010) mendefinisikan penghindaran pajak sebagai perencanaan pajak yang kontinu untuk mengurangi pajak eksplisit. Dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling, penelitian ini memilih perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) pada periode 2010-2015 sebagai sampel. Data perusahaan terpilih berjumlah 65, sehingga total pengamatan dalam penelitian ini adalah 365 perusahaan-tahun. Metode pengujian dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan data panel. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa manajemen laba riil tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap penghindaran pajak. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa manajemen laba riil yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan tidak dapat mendeteksi kegiatan penghindaran pajak yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Sementara itu, hubungan politik memiliki dampak positif yang signifikan terhadap penghindaran pajak, yang berarti rata-rata perusahaan menggunakan koneksi politiknya untuk mendapatkan pembayaran pajak yang lebih rendah. Perusahaan cabang atau anak perusahaan dapat digunakan oleh perusahaan untuk lebih menghindari pajak dengan memanfaatkan aktivitas luar negeri yang melekat pada mereka untuk mengurangi pajak melalui skema profit shifting serta profit holding sebagaimana dibuktikan oleh hasil penelitian.
Kata Kunci: koneksi politik; aktivitas luar negeri; manajemen laba; penghindaran pajak.
Abstract. This research is aimed to provide empirical evidence about relationship between political connection, foreign activity, and real earnings management on tax avoidance. Hanlon & Heitzman (2010) defines tax avoidance as a continuum tax planning strategis to reduce the explicit taxes. Using purposive sampling, this research selects manufacturing companies that are listed in Indonesian Stock Exchange (IDX) in the period 2010-2015 as samples. Selected company data amounted to 65, so the total observation in this study are 365 firm-years. The data examination in this study uses multiple regression analysis with dated panel.
The results of this study indicate that real earnings management has no significant effect on tax avoidance. These results mean that real earnings management conducted by the company can not detect tax avoidance activities undertaken by manufacturing firms in IDX. Meanwhile, political connections have a significant positive effect on tax avoidance, meaning that the average company uses its political connections to lower tax payments. Furthermore, a branch or subsidiary-like company can be used by companies to avoid more taxes by utilizing foreign activities stick to them to reduce taxes through profit shifting schemes as well as profit holding as evidenced by a significant positive effect.
Keywords: earnings management; foreign activity; political connection; tax avoidance.
Abstrak. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk memberikan bukti empiris terkait hubungan antara koneksi politik, aktivitas luar negeri, dan manajemen laba riil terhadap praktik penghindaran pajak. Hanlon & Heitzman (2010) mendefinisikan penghindaran pajak sebagai perencanaan pajak yang kontinu untuk mengurangi pajak eksplisit. Dengan menggunakan metode purposive sampling, penelitian ini memilih perusahaan manufaktur yang terdaftar di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI) pada periode 2010-2015 sebagai sampel. Data perusahaan terpilih berjumlah 65, sehingga total pengamatan dalam penelitian ini adalah 365 perusahaan-tahun. Metode pengujian dalam penelitian ini menggunakan analisis regresi berganda dengan data panel. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa manajemen laba riil tidak berpengaruh signifikan terhadap penghindaran pajak. Hasil ini menunjukkan bahwa manajemen laba riil yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan tidak dapat mendeteksi kegiatan penghindaran pajak yang dilakukan oleh perusahaan manufaktur di Bursa Efek Indonesia (BEI). Sementara itu, hubungan politik memiliki dampak positif yang signifikan terhadap penghindaran pajak, yang berarti rata-rata perusahaan menggunakan koneksi politiknya untuk mendapatkan pembayaran pajak yang lebih rendah. Perusahaan cabang atau anak perusahaan dapat digunakan oleh perusahaan untuk lebih menghindari pajak dengan memanfaatkan aktivitas luar negeri yang melekat pada mereka untuk mengurangi pajak melalui skema profit shifting serta profit holding sebagaimana dibuktikan oleh hasil penelitian.
Kata Kunci: koneksi politik; aktivitas luar negeri; manajemen laba; penghindaran pajak.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adhikari, A., Derashid, C., & Zhang, H. (2006). Public policy, political connections, and effective tax rates: Longitudinal evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 25(5), 574–595. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2006.07.001
Ajaz, T., & Ahmad, E. (2010). The effect of corruption and governance on tax revenues. Pakistan Development Review, 49(4), 405–417.
Ariffin, Z. Z. (2013). Tax planning of a company operating foreign activity in Malaysia. International Journal of Trade, Economics and Finance, 4(4), 209–212. https://doi.org/10.7763/IJTEF.2013.V4.287
Blaylock, B., Shevlin, T., & Wilson, R. J. (2012). Tax Avoidance, Large Positive Temporary Book-Tax Differences, and Earnings Persistence. The Accounting Review, 87(1), 91–120. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr-10158
Chen, S., Chen, X., Cheng, Q., & Shevlin, T. J. (2007). Are Family Firms More Tax Aggressive Than Non-Family Firms? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1014280
Cheng, C. S. A., Huang, H., Li, Y., & Stanfield, J. W. (2012). The Effect of Hedge Fund Activism on Corporate Tax Avoidance. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1905544
Cohen, D. A., Dey, A., & Lys, T. Z. (2008). Management in the Pre- and Post-Sarbanes-Oxley Periods. Accounting Review, 83(3), 757–787.
Desai, M. A. (2003). The Divergence between Book Income and Tax Income. Tax Policy and the Economy, 17, 169–206. https://doi.org/10.1086/tpe.17.20140508
Dewi, N. ., & Jati, I. . (2014). Pengaruh Karakter Eksekutif, Karakteristik Perusahaan, Dan Dimensi Tata Kelola Perusahaan Yang Baik Pada Tax Avoidance Di Bursa Efek Indonesia. E-Jurnal Akuntansi Universitas Udayana, 6(2), 249–260.
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2015). Annual Report DJP. Retrieved March 29, 2017, from http://www.pajak.go.id/content/laporan-tahunan-djp-2015
Direktorat Jenderal Pajak. (2016). Refleksi Tingkat Kepatuhan Wajib Pajak. Retrieved March 29, 2017, from http://www.pajak.go.id/content/article/refleksi-tingkat-kepatuhan-wajib-pajak
Dridi, W., & Boubaker, A. (2015). The Difference between the Accounting Result and Taxable Income in Detecting Earnings Management and Tax Management: The Tunisian Case. International Journal of Business and Management, 10(7), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.5539/ijbm.v10n7p131
Dumitrescu, C., & Scalera, F. (2012). Strategies of Multinational Enterprises. International Journal of Business and Commerce, 1(7), 12–27.
Dwijugsteadi, K. (2016). 2.000 Perusahaan Asing Gelapkan Pajak Selama 10 Tahun. Retrieved from http://bisnis.liputan6.com/read/2469089/2000-perusahaan-asing-gelapkan-pajak-selama-10-tahun
Faccio, M. (2007). The characteristics of politically connected firms. The Characteristics of Politically Connected Firms, 1–34.
Faccio, M., Masulis, R. W., & McConnell, J. J. (2006). Political Connections and Corporate Bailouts. The Journal of Finance, 61(6), 2597–2635. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-6261.2006.01000.x
Frank, M. M., Lynch, L. J., & Rego, S. O. (2005). Does Aggressive Financial Reporting Accompany Aggressive Tax Reporting (and Vice Versa)? SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.647604
García Lara, J. M., Garcia Osma, B., & Mora, A. (2005). Discussion of the Effect of Earnings Management on the Asymmetric Timeliness of Earnings. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=708665
Geraldina, I. (2013). Preferensi Manajemen Laba Akrual Atau Manajemen Laba Riil Dalam Aktivitas Tax Shelter. Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia, 10(2), 206–224. https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2013.11
Ghozali, I. (2016). Aplikasi Analisis Multivariate Dengan Program IBM SPSS 23 (8th ed.). Semarang: Badan Penerbit Universitas Diponegoro.
Goldman, E., Rocholl, J., & So, J. (2009). Do Politically Connected Boards Affect Firm Value? Review of Financial Studies, 22(6), 2331–2360. https://doi.org/10.1093/rfs/hhn088
Graham, J. R., Harvey, C. R., & Rajgopal, S. (2005). The Economic Implications of Corporate Financial Reporting. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.491627
Gujarati, D. N. (2012). Basic Econometric. Jakarta (Edisi 5). Jakarta: Salemba Empat. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1186874
Gujarati, D. N., & Porter, D. C. (2009). Basic econometrics. McGraw-Hill Irwin.
Hanlon, M., & Heitzman, S. (2010). A review of tax research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 50(2), 127–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2010.09.002
Hanlon, M., Maydew, E., & Shevlin, T. (2005). Book-Tax Conformity and the Information Content of Earnings.
Hansson, Å., Olofsdotter, K., & Thede, S. (2016). Do Multinationals Pay Less in Taxes than Domestic Firms? Evidence from the Swedish Manufacturing Sector Do multinationals pay less in taxes than domestic firms? Evidence from the Swedish manufacturing sector.
Harris, M. N., & Feeny, S. (2003). Habit persistence in effective tax rates. Applied Economics, 35(8), 951–958. https://doi.org/10.1080/0003684032000050577
Healy, P. M. (1985). The effect of bonus schemes on accounting decisions. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7(1–3), 85–107. https://doi.org/10.1016/0165-4101(85)90029-1
Healy, P. M., & Wahlen, J. M. (1999). A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4), 365–383. https://doi.org/10.2308/acch.1999.13.4.365
Hidayah, N. (2015). Pengaruh perusahaan keluarga, multinational company, dan kepemilikan institusional terhadap tax avoidance, Vol. 2, No, 1–13.
Hundal, S. (2011). Why Tax Avoidance is among the biggest issues of our generation | Liberal Conspiracy. Retrieved March 29, 2017, from http://liberalconspiracy.org/2011/03/29/why-tax-avoidance-is-among-the-biggest-issues-of-our-generation/
Ibrahim, S. S. (2009). The Usefulness of Measures of Consistency of Discretionary Components of Accruals in the Detection of Earnings Management. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 36(9–10), 1087–1116. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1468-5957.2009.02171.x
Jaggi, B., & Lee, P. (2002). Earnings Management Response to Debt Covenant Violations and Debt Restructuring. Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 17(4), 295–324. https://doi.org/10.1177/0148558X0201700402
Johnson, S., & Mitton, T. (2003). Cronyism and capital controls: evidence from Malaysia. Journal of Financial Economics, 67(2), 351–382. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0304-405X(02)00255-6
Kim, C., & Zhang, L. (2016). Corporate Political Connections and Tax Aggressiveness. Contemporary Accounting Research, 33(1), 78–114. https://doi.org/10.1111/1911-3846.12150
Kim, J.-B., Li, Y., & Zhang, L. (2011). Corporate tax avoidance and stock price crash risk: Firm-level analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 100(3), 639–662. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2010.07.007
Kothari, S. P., Mizik, N., & Roychowdhury, S. (2016). Managing for the Moment: The Role of Real Activity Versus Accruals Earnings Management in SEO Valuation. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.1982826
Kroszner, R. S., & Stratmann, T. (1996). Interest Group Competition and the Organization of Congress: Theory and Evidence from Financial Services Political Action Committees. Retrieved from https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=7358
Krueger, A. O. (1974). The Political Economy of the Rent-Seeking Society. American Economic Review, 64(3), 291–303. Retrieved from http://econpapers.repec.org/article/aeaaecrev/v_3a64_3ay_3a1974_3ai_3a3_3ap_3a291-303.htm
Leblang, S. (1998). International Double Nontaxation. Taxnote.
Lee, B. B., Dobiyanski, A., & Minton, S. (2015). Theories and Empirical Proxies for Corporate Tax Avoidance. Journal of Applied Business and Economics, 17(3), 21–34. https://doi.org/http://dx.doi.org/10.1108/17506200710779521
Li, H., Meng, L., Wang, Q., & Zhou, L.-A. (2008). Political connections, financing and firm performance: Evidence from Chinese private firms. Journal of Development Economics, 87(2), 283–299. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jdeveco.2007.03.001
Lisowsky, P., Robinson, L., & Schmidt, A. (2013). Do Publicly Disclosed Tax Reserves Tell Us About Privately Disclosed Tax Shelter Activity? Journal of Accounting Research, 51(3), 583–629. https://doi.org/10.1111/joar.12003
Mahenthrian, S., & Kasipillai, J. (2012). Influence of Ownership Structure and Corporate Governance on Effective Tax Rates and Tax Planning: Malaysian Evidence. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2384718
Mobarak, A. M., & Purbasari, D. (2005). Political Trade Protection in Developing Countries: Firm Level Evidence from Indonesia. SSRN Electronic Journal. https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.770949
Mohd Ghazali, N. A., & Weetman, P. (2006). Perpetuating traditional influences: Voluntary disclosure in Malaysia following the economic crisis. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 15(2), 226–248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.intaccaudtax.2006.08.001
Mulyana, Ade. (2012). Terbukti, Gayus Terima Suap dari Bakrie Group. Retrieved from http://www.rmol.co/read/2012/03/01/56361/Terbukti,-Gayus-Terima-Suap-dari-Bakrie-Group-
Mulyani, S., Darminto, & N.P, M. G. W. E. (2014). Pengaruh Karakteristik Perusahaan, Koneksi Politik dan Reformasi Perpajakan terhadap Penghindaran Pajak. A Handbook for Tax Simplification.
Mustika, C. (2012). Pajak Penghasilan Di Indonesia (Peraturan,Perhitungan dan Upaya Peningkatan Potensi Penerimaan) dan Kaitannya Dengan Investasi di Indonesia, Vol. 1, No, 227–238.
OECD. (2012). Multi-Country Analysis of Existing Transfer Pricing Simplification Measures - 2012 Update, (May), 155.
Olson, M. (1993). Dictatorship, Democracy, and Development. American Political Science Review, 87(3), 567–576. https://doi.org/10.2307/2938736
Pranoto, B. A., & Ari Kuncoro Widagdo. (2013). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik dan Corporate Governance Terhadap Tax Aggressiveness. Seminar Nasional Dan The 3rd Call for Syariah Paper, 2(2), 472–486.
Ratmono, D. (Universitas D. (2010). Manajemen Laba Riil Dan Berbasis Akrual: Dapatkah Auditor Yang Berkualitas Mendeteksinya? SNA XIII Purwokerto, 1(2005), 1–23.
Rego, S. O. (2003). Tax-Avoidance Activities of U.S. Multinational Corporations. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(4), 805–833. https://doi.org/10.1506/VANN-B7UB-GMFA-9E6W
Rego, S. O., & Wilson, R. (2012). Equity Risk Incentives and Corporate Tax Aggressiveness. Journal of Accounting Research, 50(3), 775–810. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1475-679X.2012.00438.x
Richardson, G., Taylor, G., & Lanis, R. (2013). Determinants of transfer pricing agressiveness: Empirical evidence from Australian firms, 9(2), 136–150.
Richter, B. K., Samphantharak, K., & Timmons, J. F. (2009). Lobbying and Taxes. American Journal of Political Science, 53(4), 893–909. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1540-5907.2009.00407.x
Roychowdhury, S. (2006). Earnings management through real activities manipulation. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 42(3), 335–370. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jacceco.2006.01.002
Ruiz, C. V. (2016). Literature review of earnings management : Who , why , when , how and what for ? Finnish Business Review, 1–13.
Samingun. (2012). Manajemen Laba untuk Tujuan Pajak: Determinan, Metode, dan Pengaruhnya Terhadap Nilai Perusahaan. Disertasi Universitas Indonesia.
Schipper, K. (1986). Commentary on Earnings Management. Accounting, Organizations and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/0361-3682(86)90013-9
Scott, W. R. (William R. (2014). Financial accounting theory.
Shackelford, D. A., & Shevlin, T. (2001). Empirical tax research in accounting. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 31(1), 321–387. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0165-4101(01)00022-2
Stigler, G. J. (1971). The Theory of Economic Regulation. The Bell Journal of Economics and Management Science, 2(1), 3. https://doi.org/10.2307/3003160
Stopford, J. M., & Wells, Jr., L. T. (1972). Managing the Multinational Enterprise: Organization of the Firm and Ownership of the Subsidiary. Retrieved from http://www.hbs.edu/faculty/Pages/item.aspx?num=179
Sudibyo, Y. A., & Jianfu, S. (2015). Institutional Theory For Explaining Corruption: An Empirical Study On Public Sector Organizations In China And Indonesia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(1). https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i1c8p1
Sudibyo, Y. A., & Jianfu, S. (2016). Political Connections, State Owned Enterprises and Tax Avoidance : an Evidence From Indonesia. Corporate Ownership and Control, 13(3), 1–6. https://doi.org/10.22495/cocv13i3c2p2
Sugiyono. (2011). Metode Penelitian Kuantitatif, kualitatif dan R & D. Bandung: Alfabeta, 90.
Sulistio, T. (2016). BEI Dorong Perusahaan Multinasional Masuk Bursa. Retrieved from http://berita.suaramerdeka.com/smcetak/bei-dorong-perusahaan-multinasional-masuk-bursa/
Sumantoro. (1987). Kegiatan Perusahaan Multinasional.
Tehupuring, R., & Rossa, E. (2016). Pengaruh Koneksi Politik dan Kualitas Audit Terhadap Praktik Penhindaran Pajak di Lembaga Perbankan Yang Terdaftar di Pasar Modal Indonesia Periode 2012-2014. Prosiding Seminar Nasional INDOCOMPAC, 366–376.
Transparency International. (2015). Corruption Perceptions Index 2015.
Watts, R. L., & Zimmerman, J. L. (1990). Positive Accounting Theory: A Ten Year Perspective. The Accounting Review, 65(1), 131–156. Retrieved from http://www.jstor.org/stable/247880
Way, M., Psychotherapies, C., History, M. L., & Learnings, S. (1992). Multinational corporations. Scandinavian International Business Review, 1(2), 70–71. https://doi.org/10.1016/0962-9262(92)90023-Y
Wilson, R. J. (2009). An Examination of Corporate Tax Shelter Participants. The Accounting Review, 84(3), 969–999. https://doi.org/10.2308/accr.2009.84.3.969
Wooldridge, J. M. (2002). Econometric Analysis of Cross Section and Panel Data.
Dokumentasi Publik dan Perundang-undangan
Indonesia (2016). Laporan Keuangan Pemerintah Pusat (LKPP) Tahun 2015 Audited. ). Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan. Atau http://www.kemenkeu.go.id/sites/default/files/LKPP%202015%20Audited.pdf, diakses 20 Maret 2017.
Indonesia (2015). Rencana Strategis Direktorat Jenderal Pajak (Renstra DJP) Tahun 2015—2019. Jakarta: Direktorat Jenderal Pajak.
Indonesia (2014). Peraturan Komisi Pemilihan Umum (PKPU) Nomor PKPU-17/2014 tentang Dana Kampanye Peserta Pemilihan Umum Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Tahun 2014. Jakarta: Komisi Pemilihan Umum.
Indonesia (2011). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) Nomor PMK-76/PMK.03/2011 tentang Tata Cara Pencatatan dan Pelaporan Sumbangan Penanggulangan Bencana Nasional, Sumbangan Penelitian dan Pengembangan, Sumbangan Fasilitas Pendidikan, Sumbangan Pembinaan Olahraga, dan Biaya Pembangunan Infrastruktur Sosial Yang Dapat Dikurangkan Dari Penghasilan Bruto. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan.
Indonesia (2010). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) Nomor PMK-71/PMK.03/2010 tentang Pengusaha Kena Pajak Berisiko Rendah Yang Diberikan Pengembalian Pendahuluan Kelebihan Pajak. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan.
Indonesia (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 36 Tahun 2008 tentang Pajak Penghasilan. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan.
Indonesia (2008). Peraturan Menteri Keuangan (PMK) Nomor PMK-256/PMK.03/2008 tentang Penetapan Saat Diperolehnya Dividen Oleh Wajib Pajak Dalam Negeri Atas Penyertaan Modal Pada Badan Usaha Luar Negeri Selain Badan Usaha Yang Menjual Sahamnya di Bursa Efek. Jakarta: Kementerian Keuangan.
Indonesia (2008). Undang-Undang Republik Indonesia Nomor 25 Tahun 2007 tentang Penanaman Modal. Jakarta: Badan Koordinasi Penanaman Modal.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jrak.v5i3.9223
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Jurnal Riset Akuntansi dan Keuangan is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
View My Stats