THE IMPLEMENTATION OF CIPP AS EVALUATION MODEL ON TEACHING ASSISTANCE IN SD BALI BILINGUAL SCHOOL AS THE PRACTICE OF KURIKULUM MERDEKA

Luh Made Dwi Wedayanthi, Putu Beny Pradnyana, Pande Agus Adiwijaya

Abstract


This research is evaluation model research by using CIPP as the evaluation model on Teaching Assistance in SD Bali Bilingual School in Bangli Regency, Bali. The CIPP model is Context, Input, Process, and Product, this model is one of the models used frequently in educational evaluation. The implementation is used the evaluative model created by Stufflebeam. The evaluation specifications on teaching assistance at SD Bali Bilingual School in Bangli Regency which displays an average score on the context aspects in the teaching assistance program is 83% including the category good, while the input evaluation is 82% in the good category. The same is true for the process aspect, which has an 81% in the good category, and the product aspect is 80% enough category. This is consistent with research from the aspects of Context, Input, Process, and Product obtained with the good criteria. This can indicate that the Teaching Assistance program was well conducted in SD Bali Bilingual School, in Bangli Regency.


Keywords


Evaluation Model, CIPP, Teaching Assistance.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arifin, Z., Indonesia, U. P., & Kejuruan, S. M. (2012). Implementasi Manajemen Stratejik Berbasis Kemitraan Dalam Meningkatkan Mutu SMK (Studi Pada SMK Kelompok Teknologi Bidang Otomotif di Kota Yogyakarta). Jurnal Administrasi Pendidikan UPI, 14(1), 60–70. https://doi.org/10.17509/jap.v14i1.6708

Arikunto, S. (2019). Prosedur penelitian suatu pendekatan praktik.

Andreas Putra, A. T., Zarita, R., & Nurhafidah, N. (2021). Evaluasi Program Pendidikan Agama Islam Menggunakan Model Evaluasi CIPP. Zawiyah: Jurnal Pemikiran Islam, 7(2). https://doi.org/10.31332/zjpi.v7i2.3459

Febriana, Rina. 2019. EVALUASI PEMBELAJARAN. Jakarta: PT Bumi Aksara.

Fitzpatrick, J. L. (2011). Program Evaluation: Alternative Approaches

and Practical Guidelines (4th edition). New Jersey: Pearson Education.

Gronlund, Norman E. 1976. Measurement and Evaluation in Teaching. Washington: Amazon Publisher.

Hasanudin, C., Wagiran, W., & Subyantoro, S. (2021). Evaluasi Perkuliahan Daring Keterampilan Menulis selama Masa Pandemi Covid-19 dengan Model Evaluasi CIPP. Jurnal Pendidikan Edutama, 8(2). https://doi.org/10.30734/jpe.v8i2.1784

Khairunnisa, B. W. (2021). Model Concurrent Transformative dalam Desain Metode Penelitian Campuran: Sebuah Pengenalan. Syntax Idea, 3(9). https://doi.org/10.36418/syntax-idea.v3i9.1488

Rachmawati, N., Marini, A., Nafiah, M., & Nurasiah, I. (2022). Projek Penguatan Profil Pelajar Pancasila dalam Impelementasi Kurikulum Prototipe di Sekolah Penggerak Jenjang Sekolah Dasar. Jurnal Basicedu(6), 3613-3625. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/basicedu.v6i3.2714

Risdianto, E. (2019). Analisis Pendidikan Indonesia di Era Revolusi Industri 4.0. In Research Gate.

Sadewa, M. A. (2022). Meninjau Kurikulum Prototipe Melalui Pendekatan Integrasi-Interkoneksi Prof M Amin Abdullah. Jurnal Pendidikan Dan Konseling, 4(1), 266-280. doi:https://doi.org/10.31004/edukatif.v4i1.2410

Santoso, H. D., Sari, D. P., Fadilla, A. D., Utami, F. F., Rahayu, F. P., Sari, D. C., & Sya’bani, N. P. (2022). Asistensi Mengajar, Adaptasi Teknologi, Dan Administrasi Dalam Program Kampus Mengajar. Jurnal Pengabdian Dharma Laksana, 4(2). https://doi.org/10.32493/j.pdl.v4i2.18220

Stufflebeam, D. (2000). The CIPP Model for Evaluation. In D. Stufflebeam, G. Madaus, & T. Kellaghan, Evaluation Models: Evaluation in Education and Human Services (pp. 279–317). Dordrecht: Springer.

Stufflebeam, D. L., & Coryn, C. L. S. (2014). Evaluation theory, models, and applications (2nd ed.). San Francisco, CA: Jossey-Bass.

Stufflebeam, D. L., Foley, W. J., Gephart, W. J., Guba, E. G., Hammond, R. L., Merriman, H. O., & Provus, M. (1971). Educational evaluation and decision making (Chapters 3, 7, & 8). Itasca, IL: F. E. Peacock.

Sulistyo, A. (2017). EVALUASI PROGRAM BUDAYA MEMBACA DI SEKOLAH DASAR NEGERI. Kelola: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan, 4(1), 48–58.https://doi.org/10.24246/j.jk.2017.v4.i1.p48-58

Uran, L. L. (2018). Evaluasi implementasi KTSP dan Kurikulum 2013 pada SMK seKabupaten Belu, Nusa Tenggara Timur. Jurnal Penelitian Dan Evaluasi Pendidikan, 22(1). https://doi.org/10.21831/pep.v22i1.13309

Yeni, D. I., Wulandari, H., & Hadiati, E. (2020). Pelaksanaan Program Pemberian Makanan Sehat Anak Usia Dini : Studi Evaluasi Program CIPP. Murhum : Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini. https://doi.org/10.37985/murhum.v1i2.9




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/eh.v16i1.59591

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2024 EduHumaniora | Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Kampus Cibiru

 

EduHumaniora: Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar

Published in collaboration Program Studi PGSD UPI Kampus Cibiru

and

HDPGSDI

Creative Commons Attribution ShareAlike license icon

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats