Thematic Park As Recreational Areas: Recidents Preferences

Enok Maryani, Apay Safari, Anti Riyanti, Hadi Mulyana

Abstract


The existence of city parks as Green Open Space (GOS) is very important. It has not only ecological and hidrological function, but also recreational function. It also becomes social capital developer of urban communities. This study examined the existence of GOS in Bandung, and residents’ preferences for choosing thematic parks as recreational place. The study was conducted through surveys, observation, documentation, and literature. The survey was conducted to 100 respondents in 11 thematic parks in Bandung. There were several findings of this study. First, parks in Bandung only covered 43% of the total area of Bandung. In fact, the portion of the parks should be 30% of the total region. Thus, there was a deficiency (56.73%).  Second, there were several factor motivating the residents coming to the park: access, price, and its function as recreational place. Third, the characteristic of park visitors was the quite the same. There is no significant difference in the case of gender, age, education, and occupation. Then, most of the visitor coming to the park on the weekend or after working. Regarding the length of visit, they frequently spent more than 2 hours. Fourth, there was significant correlation of park physical condition, park non-physical condition, and residents’ preferences (> 0.91 and sig. at 0.001). However, there were several things that should be addressed, such as : (1) parking lots, zebra crossing, managers who monitor the park and internet facilities; and (2) limited areas for activities, seating, plant diversity, and garden lighting at night. In addition, the name of the park needs to be carefully considered to suit the purpose, location, and interests of residents.

Keywords


thematic park; recreational areas; recidents preferences

Full Text:

PDF

References


Budihardjo, E. (1997). Lingkungan Binaan dan Tata Ruang Kota. Yogyakarta. Penerbit ANDI.

Carr, S. (1992). Public space. Cambridge University Press.

Daluarti, M. H. C. (2015). Peranan Ruang Publik Perkotaan Terhadap Pengembangan Modal Sosial Dan Peredam Patologi Sosial: survey pada siswa sma di Kota Bandung (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Darmawan, E., 2006, Teori dan Kajian Ruang Publik Kota, Semarang : Universitas Diponegoro.

Frick, H., 2006, Arsitektur Ekologis : Konsep Arsitektur Ekologis Di Iklim Tropis, Penghijauan Kota Dan Kota Ekologis, Serta Energi Terbarukan. Semarang: Penerbit Kanisius.

Garvin, Alexander dan Gayle Berens. 1997. Urban Parks and Open Space. Washington:The Urban Land Institute.

Gold, Seymour M., 1980, Recreation Planning and Design, New York:Mcgraw-Hill.

Imansari, N., & Khadiyanta, P. (2015). Penyediaan hutan kota dan taman kota sebagai ruang terbuka hijau (RTH) publik menurut preferensi masyarakat di kawasan pusat Kota Tangerang. Jurnal Ruang, 1(3), 101-110..

Kotler, P. (2007). Manajemen Pemasaran, Jilid 2.

Kotler, Philip, 2003, Marketing Management , Edition,11th edition, NewJersey :Prentice Hall.

Masri Singarimbun dan Sofian Effendi. 1982. Metode Penelitian Survai. Jakarta:Lembaga Penelitian, Pendidikan dan Penerangan Ekonomi dan Sosial (LP3ES).

Mehrens, W.A., & Lehmann, I.J. (1973). Measurement and evaluation in education and psychology. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston. Inc.

Nurlianti, W. (2006). Hutan, Solusi Bencana Sumberdaya Air. Laporan Akhir Tahun Pikiran Rakyat, 22 Desember 2006.

Ridwana, R., Maryani, E., & Nandi, N. (2018). Pengembangan Kawasan Situ Gede Sebagai Objek Wisata Andalan Kota Tasikmalaya. Jurnal Geografi Gea, 18(2), 135-146.

Stanton, J. William. (2000), Prinsip-prinsip Pemasaran, Jakarta : Erlangga.

Sujarto, D., & Budiharjo, E. (1999). Kota berkelanjutan. Bandung: Penerbit Alumni.

Thwaites, K., Helleur, E., & Simkins, I. M. (2005). Restorative urban open space: Exploring the spatial configuration of human emotional fulfilment in urban open space. Landscape research, 30(4), 525-547.

Whyte, W. H. (1980). The social life of small urban spaces. New York : Project for Public Space .

Widjajanti, W. W. (2010). Keberadaan dan Optimasi Ruang Terbuka Hijau bagi Kehidupan Kota. J. ITATS, 7.

Wulandari, C. (2005). Strategi pengembangan pembayaran dan imbal jasa lingkungan di indonesia: peningkatan kapasitas untuk penguatan pemangku peran (stakeholders) pengelola jasa lingkungan. Prosiding. Lokakarya Nasional Pembayaran dan Imbal Jasa Lingkungan, 11.

Yusuf, A. M. (2016). Metode penelitian kuantitatif, kualitatif & penelitian gabungan. Jakarta : Prenada Media.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v23i2.59192

DOI (PDF): https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v23i2.59192.g24475

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Jurnal Geografi Gea

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.