IINSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (PCK) UNTUK MENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN MENGAJAR CALON GURU
Abstract
Abstrak
Guru dan calon guru harus memiliki kualifikasi akademik yang baik, khususnya kompetensi pedagogik dan kompetensi profesional. Kompetensi pedagogik terkait dengan kemampuan guru dalam melaksanakan pembelajaran, sedangkan kompetensi profesional meliputi kemampuan guru dalam menguasai materi bidang studi. Sehingga diperlukan instrument untuk dapat mengetahui kualitas pedagogik dan konten yang dimiliki oleh calon guru khususnya sebelum bekerja di sekolah. Pengembangan instrument pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) dilakukan dengan metode pengembangan dengan 4 tahapan yaitu 4D (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate). Pengembangan instrument soal dikhususkan pada materi Fisika Dasar dan materi pembelajaran fisika. Instrumen penilaian Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) telah dikembangkan sesuai dengan prosedur dan telah teruji validitasnya secara empiris dan mendapatkan surat pencatatan hak cipta. Selain itu, berdasarkan hasil angket respon dan skor jawaban mahasiswa pada uji coba terbatas dapat diketahui profil kemampuan PCK mahasiswa yang masih memerlukan peningkatan dan pembimbingan lebih intensif melalui kegiatan akademik.
Abstract
Teachers and prospective teachers must have good academic qualifications, especially pedagogic competence and professional competence. Pedagogic competence is related to the teacher's ability to carry out learning, while professional competence includes the teacher's ability to master the subject matter. So that an instrument is needed to be able to determine the pedagogic quality and content possessed by prospective teachers, especially before working in schools. The development of pedagogical content knowledge (PCK) instruments is carried out using a development method with four stages, namely 4D (Define, Design, Develop, and Disseminate). The development of the question instrument is devoted to fundamental physics and physics learning materials. The Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) assessment instrument has been developed following the procedures and has been empirically tested for validity and received a copyright registration letter. In addition, based on the results of the response questionnaire and student answer scores in the limited trial, it can be seen that the PCK ability profile of students still requires improvement and more intensive guidance through academic activities.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Arikunto, S. (2009). Dasar-Dasar Evaluasi Pendidikan (Edisi Revisi). Yogyakarta: Bumi Aksara
Erwin, Rustaman, N. Y., Firman H. and Ramalis T. R. (2019). Instrumen Asesmen Pedagogical content Knowledge dalam Konteks Pengembangan Keterampilan Komunikasi Saintifik pada Pembelajaran Fisika, Titian Ilmu: Jurnal Ilmiah Multi Sciences, 11 (2): 102-110.
Falk, A. (2011). Teachers learning from professional development in elementary science: Reciprocal relations between formative assessment and pedagogical content knowledge. Science education, 96(2), 265-290.
Fraser, S P. (2016). Pedagogical content knowledge (PCK): Exploring its usefulness for science lecturers in higher education. Research in Science Education, 46(1), 141-161.
Gall, M D., & Gall, J. P. (2003). Educational research: An introduction. Boston: Pearson Education, Inc.
Gess-Newsome, J., Taylor, J. A., Carlson, J., Gardner, A. L., Wilson, C. D., & Stuhlsatz, M. A. (2019). Teacher pedagogical content knowledge, practice, and student achievement. International Journal of Science Education, 41(7), 944-963.
Kirschner, S., Borowski, A. & Fischer, H.E. (2011). Physics teachersV content knowledge and pedagogical content knowledge: Developing test scales and measuring the relation. In Annual Meeting of NARST, Orlando, FL.
Lee, E., & Luft. J.A. (2008). Experienced secondary science teachers’ representation of pedagogical content knowledge. International Journal of Science Education, 30(10), 1343-1363.
Padila, T. M, Anwar Y. & Madang, K. (2017). Analisis Kemampuan Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Mahasiswa Calon Guru Biologi FKIP Unsri Sebelum dan Setelah Praktik Mengajar, Prosiding Seminar Nasional Pendidikan IPA 2017, 23 September 2017.
Rohaan, E. J., Taconis, R., Jochems, W. M. G., Lange, K., Kleickmann, T., Moeller, K., ... & Fischer, H. E. (2009). Different approaches to measure teacher's pedagogical content knowledge. In ESERA 2009 Conference (pp. 59-60).
Sarkim, T. (2015). Pedagogical content knowlegde: sebuah konstruk untuk memahami kinerja guru di dalam pembelajaran. Prosiding Pertemuan Ilmiah XXIX HFI Jateng & DIY, Yogyakarta, 25, 0853-0823.
Shulman, L. S. (1986). Those who understand: Knowledge growth in teaching. Educational researcher, 15(2), 4-14.
Wilson, A.(2012). Student Engagement and The Role of Feedback in Learning, Journal of Pedagogic Development. 2 (1): 1-5.
Yulianti,E. & Pratiwi, N. (2017). Identifikasi Pedagogical Content Knowledge (PCK) Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA FMIPA Universitas Negeri Malang Tahun 2016 Melalui Kegiatan Kuliah Praktik Lapangan (KPL) Berbasis Lesson Study. Jurnal Pembelajaran Sains, 1(2), 1-5.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/pdgia.v19i2.36504
Refbacks
- INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (PCK) UNTUK MENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN MENGAJAR CALON GURU
- INSTRUMEN PENILAIAN PEDAGOGICAL CONTENT KNOWLEDGE (PCK) UNTUK MENGUKUR KEMAMPUAN MENGAJAR CALON GURU
INDEXED BY
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License