Sport Student Statistical Reasoning Ability as the Outcomes of Statistical Reasoning Learning Environment

Nidaul Hidayah, Mona Fiametta Febrianty, Fitri Rosdiana

Abstract


This research aimed to describe the quality of sports student Statistical Reasoning Ability (SRA) through the Statistical Reasoning Learning Environment (SRLE). This research employed a qualitative analysis. The qualitative analysis was carried out using the grounded theory method. The research subjects were 29 Sports Coaching Education Study Program students receiving SRLE learning. The research finding shows that there are five categories to describe the quality of sports student Statistical Reasoning Ability: problem understanding, concept mastery, argument validity, well-ordered thinking process, and interpretation accuracy.


Keywords


sports students, Statistical Reasoning Ability (SRA) quality, Statistical Reasoning Learning Environment (SRLE)

Full Text:

PDF

References


Albert, J., & Koning, R. (2008). Statistical Thinking in Sport. CRC Press Taylor & Francis Gruop.

Amin, Z. M., Kamariah, N., & Kamaruddin, M. (2012). A Study of the Effectiveness of The Contextual Lab Activity in the Teaching and Learning Engineering Statistics at the Universiti Tun Hussein Onn Malaysia (UTHM). US-China Education Review, A(1), 13–19.

Ben-Zvi, D., & Garfield, J. B. (Eds.). (2004). The challenge of developing statistical literacy, reasoning and thinking (pp. 3-16). Dordrecht, The Netherlands: Kluwer academic publishers.

Bryant, A. (2017). Grounded theory and grounded theorizing: Pragmatism in research practice. Oxford University Press.

Chance, B., Garfield, J., & delMas, B. (1999). A model of classroom research in action: Developing simulation activities to improve students’ statistical reasoning. 52nd Session of the International Statistical Institute, Helsinki, Finland.

Creswell, J. W. (2016). Research design: pendekatan metode kualitatif, kuantitatif, dan campuran. Yogyakarta: Pustaka Pelajar, 5.

Garfield, J. (2002). The challenge of developing statistical reasoning. Journal of statistics education, 10(3).

Garfield, J., & Ben-Zvi, D. (2009). Helping students develop statistical reasoning: Implementing a statistical reasoning learning environment. Teaching Statistics, 31(3), 72–77.

Kuper, G. H., & Sterken, E. (2007). Modelling the development of world records in running. In Statistical thinking in sports (pp. 19-44). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Lanani, K., & Doktor, D. (2015). Kemampuan penalaran statistis, komunikasi statistis dan academic help-seeking mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran berbasis proyek berbantuan ICT. Repository UPI Central Library, 1-70.

Loveland, J. (2014). Traditional Lecture Versus An Activity Approach for Teaching Statistics: A Comparison of Outcomes. In Utah State University. Utah State University.

Lovett, M. C. (2001). A collaborative convergence on studying reasoning processes: A case study in statistics. Cognition and instruction: Twenty-five years of progress, 347-384.

McHale, I., & Davies, S. (2007). Statistical analysis of the effectiveness of the FIFA world rankings. In Statistical thinking in sports (pp. 89-102). Chapman and Hall/CRC.

Nurashiken, S., & Ismail, Z. (2014). Statistical Reasoning Learning Enviroment ( SRLE ) in Teaching Video Improved Statistical Reasoning Skills. International Seminar on Innovation in Mathematics and Mathematics Education 1st ISIM-MED, 2004.

Richard, A. (2008). Learning to Teach.pdf. Pustaka Pelajar.

Tabor, J., & Franklin, C. (2011). Statistical reasoning in sports. Macmillan.

Takaria, J. (2018). Concept Mahasiswa Calon Guru Sekolah Dasar Melalui Model. Universitan Pendidikan Indonesia, April.

Ulpah, M. (2013). Peningkatan kemampuan penalaran statistis dan self-efficacy siswa madrasah aliyah melalui pembelajaran kontekstual (Doctoral dissertation, Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia).

Wahyudin. (2019). Pembelajaran dan Model-model Pembelajaran. CV. Ipa Abong.

Wei Chan, S., Ismail, Z., & Sumintono, B. (2015). The impact of statistical reasoning learning environment: A Rasch analysis. Advanced Science Letters, 21(5), 1211-1215.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v7i2.50125

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Nidaul Hidayah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web statistics

View My Stats