Authentic assessment in intensive training (bootcamp) of higher education students as well as feedback on the learning experience process

Taopik Barkah

Abstract


Authentic assessment in competency-based education should create opportunities that allow students to integrate learning and practice, resulting in mastery of the professional skills students will need in their future workplaces. Authentic assessment provides students with opportunities to engage in authentic tasks to develop, use and expand their knowledge, higher-order thinking and digital skills competencies. The role of authentic assessment in intensive training (Bootcamp) can prepare learners to improve their ability to be ready to practice when in the world of work based on tasks undertaken after completing a program in higher education. This study aims to describe the authentic form of assessment as an evaluation process used in intensive training (Bootcamp) for students to describe feedback on the Bootcamp learning experience process as consideration for improvement in the implementation of the next program. The author uses a descriptive method to provide an overview of the phenomenon studied through a literature study of existing documents. Authentic assessment activities in Bootcamp learning activities for each session per day ended with the assignment of a project called "Challenge" which was group in nature and was carried out for approximately two weeks, students were asked to express what they had understood and done during the project. Students can also give/convey feedback to each other. This is done so students can understand the material better and develop their skills.

 

Abstrak

Penilaian otentik dalam pendidikan berbasis kompetensi harus menciptakan peluang yang memungkinkan mahasiswa untuk mengintegrasikan pembelajaran dan praktik, menghasilkan penguasaan keterampilan profesional yang akan dibutuhkan mahasiswa di tempat kerja masa depan mereka. Tujuan dari penilaian otentik adalah untuk memberikan mahasiswa kesempatan untuk terlibat dalam tugas-tugas otentik untuk mengembangkan, menggunakan dan memperluas pengetahuan mereka, keterampilan berpikir tingkat tinggi dan keterampilan digital. Peran penilaian autentik dalam pelatihan intensif (Bootcamp) dapat mempersiapkan mahasiswa untuk meningkatkan kemampuannya untuk siap mempraktikkan ketika dalam lingkup dunia kerja berdasarkan tugas-tugas yang dikerjakan setelah menyelesaikan program di pendidikan tinggi. Tujuan studi ini adalah untuk mendeskripsikan bentuk penilaian otentik sebagai proses evaluasi yang digunakan dalam pelatihan intensif (Bootcamp) bagi mahasiswa, mendeskripsikan umpan balik terhadap proses pengalaman pembelajaran Bootcamp sebagai bahan pertimbangan untuk perbaikan pada pelaksanaan program berikutnya. Penulis menggunakan metode deskriptif untuk bertujuan memberikan gambaran tentang fenomena yang sedang dikaji melalui studi literatur terhadap dokumen-dokumen yang telah ada. Kegiatan penilaian otentik dalam kegiatan pembelajaran Bootcamp untuk setiap sesi per harinya diakhiri dengan pemberian penugasan proyek dengan sebutan challenge atau penugasan yang mengharuskan peserta untuk mengungkapkan apa saja yang telah mereka pahami dan lakukan selama proyek berlangsung. Sehingga mahasiswa dapat saling memberi/menyampaikan umpan balik kepada satu sama lain. Hal ini dilakukan agar mahasiswa dapat memahami materi dengan lebih baik dan mengembangkan keterampilannya.

Kata Kunci: Pelatihan intensif; pengalaman pembelajaran; penilaian otentik


Keywords


Assessment authentic; bootcamp; learning experiences

References


Ajjawi, R., Tai, J., Huu Nghia, T. L., Boud, D., Johnson, L., & Patrick, C. J. (2020). Aligning assessment with the needs of work-integrated learning: The challenges of authentic assessment in a complex context. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 304-316.

Al-Ababneh, M. (2020). Linking ontology, epistemology and research methodology. Science & Philosophy, 8(1), 75-91.

Alanson, E. R., Alanson, E. M., Arthur, B., Burdette, A., Cooper, C., & Sharp, M. (2020). Re-envisioning work-integrated learning during a pandemic: Cincinnati's experiential explorations program. International Journal of Work-Integrated Learning, 21(5), 505-519.

Arisandi, D., Widya Mutiara, M., & Christanti Mawardi, V. (2022). Dampak kegiatan Merdeka Belajar Kampus Merdeka (MBKM) magang dan studi independen dalam meningkatkan kompetensi mahasiswa. Jurnal Muara Ilmu Sosial, Humaniora, dan Seni, 6(1), 174.

Aziz, M. N. A., Yusoff, N. M., & Yaakob, M. F. M. (2020). Challenges in using authentic assessment in 21st century ESL classrooms. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 9(3), 759-768.

Beckers, J., Dolmans, D., & van Merriënboer, J. (2016). e-Portofolios enhancing students’ self-directed learning: A systematic review of influencing factors. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 32(2), 32-46.

Bell, L., & Sarlo, R. (2020). Those boots need more support: The boot camp model lacks what many students need. Reflections: Narratives of Professional Helping, 26(4), 16-24.

Brieger, E., Arghode, V., & McLean, G. (2020). Connecting theory and practice: Reviewing six learning theories to inform online instruction. European Journal of Training and Development, 44(4), 321-339.

Burton, E. P., Behrend, T. S., Matray, S., Hudson, C., & Ford, M. (2020). Development and validation of a high school STEM self‐assessment inventory. School Science and Mathematics, 120(8), 477-490.

Cheng, M., Adekola, O., Albia, J., & Cai, S. (2022). Employability in higher education: A review of key stakeholders' perspectives. Higher Education Evaluation and Development, 16(1), 16-31.

Dzvapatsva, G. P., Risinamhodzi, D. T., & Matobobo, C. (2023). Bridging unemployment gaps through ICT Bootcamps: A reality or precarity to equitable learning?. Ukrainian Journal of Educational Studies and Information Technology, 11(3), 177-197.

Fischer, J., Bearman, M., Boud, D., & Tai, J. (2023). How does assessment drive learning? A focus on students’ development of evaluative judgement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 48(7), 1-13.

Fishovitz, J., Crawford, G. L., & Kloepper, K. D. (2020). Guided heads-up: A collaborative game that promotes metacognition and synthesis of material while emphasizing higher-order thinking. Journal of Chemical Education, 97(3), 681-688.

Hajian, S. (2019). Transfer of learning and teaching: A review of transfer theories and effective instructional practices. IAFOR Journal of education, 7(1), 93-111.

Haleem, A., Javaid, M., Qadri, M. A., & Suman, R. (2022). Understanding the role of digital technologies in education: A review. Sustainable Operations and Computers, 3, 275-285.

Hu, X., Chiu, M. M., Leung, W. M. V., & Yelland, N. (2021). Technology integration for young children during COVID‐19: Towards future online teaching. British Journal of Educational Technology, 52(4), 1513-1537.

Jaggars, S. S. (2021). Introduction to the special Issue on the COVID-19 emergency transition to remote learning. Online Learning Journal (OLJ), 25(1), 1-8.

Karim, A. A., Abduh, A., Manda, D., & Yunus, M. (2018). The effectivity of authentic assessment based character education evaluation model. TEM Journal, 7(3), 495-500.

Kornelakis, A., & Petrakaki, D. (2020). Embedding employability skills in UK higher education: Between digitalization and marketization. Industry and Higher Education, 34(5), 290-297.

Kricsfalusy, V., George, C., & Reed, M. G. (2018). Integrating problem- and project-based learning opportunities: Assessing outcomes of a field course in environment and sustainability. Environmental Education Research, 24(4), 593-610.

Lissinna, B., Rashid, M., Foulds, J. L., & Forbes, K. L. (2022). Embracing uncertainty: Medical student perceptions of a pediatric bootcamp developed in response to mandated changes during the pandemic. BMC Medical Education, 22(1), 1-9.

Lyon, L. A., & Green, E. (2021). Coding boot camps: Enabling women to enter computing professions. ACM Transactions on Computing Education (TOCE), 21(2), 1-30.

Mabley, S., Ventura-Medina, E., & Anderson, A. (2020). ‘I'm lost’-a qualitative analysis of student teams' strategies during their first experience in problem-based learning. European Journal of Engineering Education, 45(3), 329-348.

Mahapatra, S. K. (2021). Online formative assessment and feedback practices of ESL teachers in India, Bangladesh and Nepal: A multiple case study. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 30(6), 519-530.

Makransky, G., Borre‐Gude, S., & Mayer, R. E. (2019). Motivational and cognitive benefits of training in immersive virtual reality based on multiple assessments. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning, 35(6), 691-707.

McGunagle, D., & Zizka, L. (2020). Employability skills for 21st-century STEM students: The employers' perspective. Higher Education, Skills and Work-based Learning, 10(3), 591-606.

Miller, E., & Konstantinou, I. (2022). Using reflective, authentic assessments to embed employability skills in higher education. Journal of Work-Applied Management, 14(1), 4-17.

Mohmmed, A. O., Khidhir, B. A., Nazeer, A., & Vijayan, V. J. (2020). Emergency remote teaching during Coronavirus pandemic: The current trend and future directive at Middle East College Oman. Innovative Infrastructure Solutions, 5, 1-11.

Ozan, C. (2019). The effect of authentic assessment on academic achievement and attitude towards educational measurement and opinions of prospective teachers. International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education, 8(2), 299-312.

Parsazadeh, N., Cheng, P. Y., Wu, T. T., & Huang, Y. M. (2021). Integrating computational thinking concept into digital storytelling to improve learners’ motivation and performance. Journal of Educational Computing Research, 59(3), 470-495.

Rapanta, C., Botturi, L., Goodyear, P., Guàrdia, L., & Koole, M. (2020). Online university teaching during and after the COVID-19 crisis: Refocusing teacher presence and learning activity. Postdigital science and education, 2(1), 923-945.

Raynault, A., Heilporn, G., Mascarenhas, A., & Denis, C. (2022). Teaching experiences of e-authentic assessment: lessons learned in higher education. Journal of Teaching and Learning with Technology, 11(1), 3-17.

Römgens, I., Scoupe, R., & Beausaert, S. (2020). Unraveling the concept of employability, bringing together research on employability in higher education and the workplace. Studies in Higher Education, 45(12), 2588-2603.

Shorten, G. D., De Robertis, E., Goldik, Z., Kietaibl, S., Niemi-Murola, L., & Sabelnikovs, O. (2020). European Section/Board of Anaesthesiology/European Society of Anaesthesiology consensus statement on competency-based education and training in anaesthesiology. European Journal of Anaesthesiology (EJA), 37(6), 421-434.

Sitthimongkolchai, N., Viriyavejakul, C., & Tuntiwongwanich, S. (2022). Blended experiential learning with e-portfolio learning to enhance creative imagination. Emerging Science Journal, 6, 25-39.

Sozudogru, O., Altinay, M., Dagli, G., Altinay, Z., & Altinay, F. (2019). Examination of connectivist theory in English language learning: The role of online social networking tool. The International Journal of Information and Learning Technology, 36(4), 354-363.

Succi, C., & Canovi, M. (2020). Soft skills to enhance graduate employability: Comparing students and employers’ perceptions. Studies in Higher Education, 45(9), 1834-1847.

Veine, S., Anderson, M. K., Andersen, N. H., Espenes, T. C., Søyland, T. B., Wallin, P., & Reams, J. (2020). Reflection as a core student learning activity in higher education - Insights from nearly two decades of academic development. International Journal for Academic Development, 25(2), 147-161.

Villarroel, V., Boud, D., Bloxham, S., Bruna, D., & Bruna, C. (2020). Using principles of authentic assessment to redesign written examinations and tests. Innovations in Education and Teaching International, 57(1), 38-49.

Wibowo, T., & Veronica, J. (2022). IT curriculum for boot camp: An iterative development in applying OBE in computer science education for non-formal institution. Journal of Education Technology, 6(4), 598-606.

Widiastuti, I. A. M. S., Mukminatien, N., Prayogo, J. A., & Irawati, E. (2020). Dissonances between teachers' beliefs and practices of formative assessment in EFL classes. International Journal of Instruction, 13(1), 71-84.

Wylie, E. C., & Lyon, C. J. (2020). Developing a formative assessment protocol to support professional growth. Educational Assessment, 25(4), 314-330.

Yan, Z. (2020). Self-assessment in the process of self-regulated learning and its relationship with academic achievement. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education, 45(2), 224-238.

Yashmi, N., Momenzade, E., Adibzade, P., Taghipour Anvari, S., Saghafi, M., Tajbakhsh, S., ... & Sarikhani, M. (2021). Design thinking-based internship; An efficient alternative for hiring product designers. Journal of Design Thinking, 2(1), 61-70.

Zainuddin, Z., Haruna, H., Li, X., Zhang, Y., & Chu, S. K. W. (2019). A systematic review of flipped classroom empirical evidence from different fields: What are the gaps and future trends?. On The Horizon, 27(2), 72-86.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Taopik Barkah

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Inovasi Kurikulum
Published by Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)
in collaboration with Curriculum Development Study Program
Faculty of Education - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Gedung FIP UPI Lt. 9 Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Bandung 40154


Indexed By:

SINTA   GARUDA   Crossref      DOAJ DIMENSIONS BASE   ROAD

Google Scholar

Google Scholar p. ISSN 1829-6750 | Google Scholar e. ISSN 2798-1363