Bridging theory, policy, and practice: Stakeholder engagement in Ghana's NPEC
Abstract
Ghana's education system is transforming significantly by implementing the National Pre-Tertiary Education Curriculum Framework (NPECF), emphasizing critical thinking and problem-solving skills over traditional rote learning. Translating these ambitious policy goals into effective classroom practices within a centralized system presents challenges. This research addresses this challenge through stakeholder analysis, examining how the involvement of policymakers, educators, parents, and local communities can bridge the gap between NPECF's theoretical ideals and practical classroom application. The research identifies potential roadblocks and opportunities for successful curriculum adoption by analyzing these diverse perspectives. Understanding the interactions and influences among policymakers, teachers, parents, and communities is crucial for transitioning smoothly from rote learning to a student-centered approach. This analysis highlights areas where stakeholders might need additional support or resources to embrace the new curriculum effectively. Ultimately, the findings can inform future educational reforms in Ghana and similar contexts, paving the way for a more effective and engaging learning experience for all students.
Abstrak
Sistem pendidikan Ghana sedang mengalami transformasi signifikan dengan implementasi National Pre-Tertiary Education Curriculum Framework (NPECF) yang menekankan kemampuan berpikir kritis dan keterampilan pemecahan masalah - lebih dari pembelajaran tradisional. Tetapi menerjemahkan tujuan kebijakan ambisius ini ke dalam praktik kelas yang efektif dalam sistem terpusat - pada gilirannya menyajikan tantangan. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menangani tantangan ini melalui analisis terhadap pemangku kepentingan, memeriksa bagaimana keterlibatan pembuat kebijakan, pendidik, orang tua, dan komunitas lokal dapat menjembatani kesenjangan antara cita-cita teoritis NPECF dengan aplikasi kelas praktis. Melalui analisis terhadap perspektif yang beragam ini, penelitian ini mengidentifikasi potensi hambatan dan peluang untuk penerapan kurikulum yang sukses. Memahami interaksi dan pengaruh antara pembuat kebijakan, guru, orang tua, dan komunitas sangat penting untuk transisi yang lancar dari pembelajaran sebelumnya yang rusak ke pendekatan pembelajaran yang berpusat pada peserta didik. Analisis ini menyoroti bidang-bidang di mana pemangku kepentingan mungkin membutuhkan dukungan atau sumber daya tambahan untuk mengaplikasikan kurikulum baru secara efektif. Akhirnya, temuan ini dapat menginformasikan reformasi pendidikan di masa depan di Ghana. Dan konteks serupa, membuka jalan bagi pengalaman belajar yang lebih efektif dan menarik bagi semua peserta didik.
Kata Kunc: layanan pendidikan Ghana; pendekatan yang berpusat pada peserta didik; keterlibatan pemangku kepentingan
Keywords
Full Text:
Download PDF (English)References
Ananga, E. D. (2021). Teachers’ standards in Ghana’s initial teacher education programme: Some implementation issues and challenges. Journal of Educational Issues, 7(1), 376-391.
Balane, M. A., Palafox, B., Palileo-Villanueva, L. M., McKee, M., & Balabanova, D. (2020). Enhancing the use of stakeholder analysis for policy implementation research: Towards a novel framing and operationalised measures. BMJ Global Health, 5(11), 1-12.
Bao, N. Van, Do, T. N., Cho, Y. C., & Thuong, P. T. S. (2024). Sensemaking in crisis: Unpacking how teachers interpret and respond to online education as street-level bureaucrats. Cogent Education, 11(1), 1-23.
Bulut-Sahin, B. (2023). International office professionals: An example of street-level bureaucrats in higher education. Education Sciences, 13(9), 890-904.
Davis, E. K., Ntow, F. D., & Beccles, C. (2022). Factors influencing Ghanaian public junior high school students’ performance in English language, Mathematics and Science and its implications on the national policy on progression. SAGE Open, 12(3), 1-11.
Dawson-Amoah, M., Smith, S. L., O’Neal, D., Clay, I., Alonso-Morris, E. A., & Kho, A. (2023). Understanding the education policymaking process in the United States. Encyclopedia, 4(1), 46-59.
Fairman, J. C., Smith, D. J., Pullen, P. C., & Lebel, S. J. (2023). The challenge of keeping teacher professional development relevant. Professional Development in Education, 49(2), 197-209.
Farr, M. (2018). Power dynamics and collaborative mechanisms in co-production and co-design processes. Critical Social Policy, 38(4), 623-644.
Francis, A. (2023). Development of social studies and its challenges in Ghana: A case study of bolgatanga technical institute in the upper east region of Ghana. Global Journal of Arts, Humanities and Social Sciences, 11(6), 37-62.
Ganon-Shilon, S., & Schechter, C. (2017). Making sense while steering through the fog: Principals' metaphors within a national reform implementation. Education Policy Analysis Archives, 25(105), 1-33.
Gaus, N., Yunus, M., Karim, A., & Sadia, H. (2019). The analysis of policy implementation models in higher education: The case study of Indonesia. Policy Studies, 40(1), 92-109.
Gorni, R. L., & Saud, S. (2023). Teacher education: A comparative analysis between colleges of education and universities with implications for Ghana. International Journal of Science and Society, 5(5), 656-667.
Howard, P., O’Brien, C., Kay, B., & O’Rourke, K. (2019). Leading educational change in the 21st century: Creating living schools through shared vision and transformative governance. Sustainability, 11(15), 1-13.
Jegede, D. (2021). Education policies of early child education programme in Nigeria: Challenges of implementation and the ways forward, 2(3), 1-10.
Khelifi, S., & Triki, M. (2020). Use of discretion on the front line of higher education policy reform: The case of quality assurance reforms in Tunisia. Higher Education, 80(3), 531-548.
Lim, L., & Apple, M. W. (2018). The politics of curriculum reforms in Asia: Inter-referencing discourses of power, culture and knowledge. Curriculum Inquiry, 48(2), 139-148.
McPhail, G. (2020). Twenty-first century learning and the case for more knowledge about knowledge. New Zealand Journal of Educational Studies, 55(2), 387-404.
Mohammed, A. K., & Kuyini, A. B. (2021). An evaluation of the free senior high school policy in Ghana. Cambridge Journal of Education, 51(2), 143-172.
Naziha, H., Ahmad, Z., & Nordin, N. (2013). The relationship between learning approaches and academic achievement among intec students, Uitm Shah Alam. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 90, 178-186.
Ntumi, S., Agbenyo, S., Tetteh, A., Yalley, C. E., Yeboah, A., & Nimo, D. G. (2023). Teacher preparedness and implementation of the national pre-tertiary education curriculum framework in Ghana. Journal of Educational Research and Practice, 13(1), 16-27.
Penuel, W. R. (2019). Infrastructuring as a practice of design-based research for supporting and studying equitable implementation and sustainability of innovations. Journal of the Learning Sciences, 28(4), 659-677.
Perry, T., Findon, M., & Cordingley, P. (2021). Remote and blended teacher education: A rapid review. Education Sciences, 11(8), 1-42.
Prieto, L. P., Rodríguez-Triana, M. J., Martínez-Maldonado, R., Dimitriadis, Y., & Gašević, D. (2019). Orchestrating learning analytics (OrLA): Supporting inter-stakeholder communication about adoption of learning analytics at the classroom level. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 35(4), 14-33.
Qureshi, M. A., Khaskheli, A., Qureshi, J. A., Raza, S. A., & Yousufi, S. Q. (2023). Factors affecting students’ learning performance through collaborative learning and engagement. Interactive Learning Environments, 31(4), 2371-2391.
Scott, I. (2021). Context and innovation in traditional bureaucracies: A Hong Kong study. Public Administration and Development, 41(1), 12-22.
Shikalepo, E. E. (2020). Challenges facing teaching at rural schools: A review of related literature. International Journal of Research and Innovation in Social Science, 4(5), 211-218.
Simmie, G. M. (2023). Teacher professional learning: a holistic and cultural endeavour imbued with transformative possibility. Educational Review, 75(5), 916-931.
Thompson, A., Bloyce, D., & Mackintosh, C. (2021). “It is always going to change”–examining the experiences of managing top-down changes by sport development officers working in national governing bodies of sport in England. Managing Sport and Leisure, 26(1), 60-79.
Trevallion, D., & Nischang, L. C. (2021). The Creativity Revolution and 21 st Century Learning. International Journal of Innovation, Creativity and Change, 15(8), 1-25.
Wilcox, K. C. (2018). resilience during policy innovation implementation. Journal of Educational Change, 19(2), 181-204.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i3.71208
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Richard Lionel Gorni, Asep Suryana, Eka Prihatin
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Inovasi Kurikulum
Published by Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)
in collaboration with Curriculum Development Study Program
Faculty of Education - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Gedung FIP UPI Lt. 9 Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Bandung 40154
Indexed By:
Google Scholar p. ISSN 1829-6750 | Google Scholar e. ISSN 2798-1363