Balancing control and freedom: Conditional autonomy in curriculum management in an Islamic Private School in Indonesia

Khairil Azhar, Mohammad Ali, Eero Ropo, Dinn Wahyudin, Angga Hadiapurwa

Abstract


This study examines the complexities of teacher autonomy in curriculum management at a private Islamic school in Indonesia, positioned within an educational environment shaped, to a certain extent, by Indonesia's shifting educational policies—oscillating between centralization and decentralization—and various religious frameworks. Through qualitative analysis of data obtained from focused group discussions involving teachers and school management, this research reveals how teacher autonomy is both supported and constrained by institutional policies, religious values, and resource availability. The main finding of this study is the emergence of a conditional autonomy model, where teachers exercise a negotiated form of autonomy within certain boundaries. On one hand, teachers’ autonomy is influenced by national educational policies, institutional frameworks, and cultural-religious norms, indicating that this autonomy is conditional rather than absolute. On the other hand, due to practical field needs, teachers make adjustments in designing curriculum content, applying various teaching methods and strategies, and adapting teaching and assessment methods based on student conditions and time availability. These dynamics are influenced by factors such as school and foundation policies, educational supervision, resource availability, and teacher creativity. This study highlights unique challenges within the Indonesian context, where teacher autonomy in curriculum management requires a deeper, context-specific approach. A balance is needed between the demands for innovation and flexibility and the support and control mechanisms that do not restrict the space for the growth of teacher agency.

 

Abstrak

Studi ini mengkaji kompleksitas otonomi guru dalam pengelolaan kurikulum di sebuah sekolah Islam swasta di Indonesia, yang diposisikan sebagai satu lingkungan pendidikan yang sampai taraf tertentu terbentuk oleh ragam kebijakan pendidikan di Indonesia yang bergerak seperti pendulum—sentralistik-desentralistik—serta faktor berbagai kerangka keagamaan. Melalui analisis kualitatif atas data yang diperoleh dari diskusi kelompok terpumpun (focused group discussion), yang melibatkan guru-guru dan manajemen sekolah, penelitian ini mengungkapkan bagaimana otonomi guru didukung sekaligus dibatasi oleh kebijakan institusi, nilai-nilai agama, dan ketersediaan sumber daya. Temuan utama dari studi ini adalah munculnya suatu model conditional autonomy (otonomi kondisional), di mana para guru menerapkan otonomi yang dinegosiasikan dalam batas-batas tertentu. Di satu sisi, otonomi para guru tidak terlepas dari pengaruh kebijakan pendidikan nasional, kerangka institusi, dan norma budaya-religius, yang menunjukkan bahwa otonomi tersebut bukanlah mutlak melainkan bersyarat. Namun, di sisi lain, karena kebutuhan praktikal di lapangan, para guru melakukan penyesuaian-penyesuaian dalam merancang isi kurikulum, menerapkan berbagai metode dan strategi pengajaran, serta menyesuaikan metode pengajaran dan penilaian berdasarkan kondisi siswa dan ketersediaan waktu. Dinamika ini sendiri dipengaruhi oleh berbagai faktor seperti kebijakan sekolah dan yayasan, supervisi pendidikan, ketersediaan sumber daya, dan kreativitas guru. Studi ini menunjukkan tantangan unik dalam konteks Indonesia, di mana otonomi guru dalam pengelolaan kurikulum memerlukan pendekatan yang lebih mendalam dan konteks-spesifik, di mana perlu keseimbangan antara kebutuhan akan inovasi dan fleksibilitas dengan mekanisme dukungan dan kontrol yang tidak menyempitkan ruang bagi pertumbuhan agency guru.

Kata Kunci: agensi guru, kerangka keagamaan, manajemen kurikulum, otonomi guru, otonomi kondisional, otonomi kurikulum, sekolah Islam swasta


Keywords


conditional autonomy, curriculum autonomy, curriculum management, private Islamic schools, religious framework, teacher agency, teacher autonomy

References


Afandi, M., Erdayani, R., Afandi, S. A., & Rafi, M. (2022). Analisis kebijakan otonomi pendidikan di Indonesia. Journal of Government Science (GovSci): Jurnal Ilmu Pemerintahan, 3(2), 85-99.

Amini, M. A., & Kruger, C. G. (2022). The role of Iranian EFL teacher autonomy and reflectivity in teacher self-directed learning: A systematic literature review. Iranian Journal of Language Teaching Research, 10(1), 101-126.

Anas, A., Ibad, A. Z., Anam, N. K., & Hariwahyuni, F. (2023). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka Madrasah Ibtidaiyah (MI): Studi analisis kebijakan KMA RI No. 347 Tahun 2022. Journal of Creative Student Research, 1(1), 99-116.

Anggraini, D. L., Yulianti, M., Nurfaizah, S., & Pandiangan, A. P. B. (2022). Peran guru dalam mengembangan kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Ilmu Pendidikan dan Sosial, 1(3), 290-298.

Arwitaningsih, R. P., Dewi, B. F., Rahmawati, E. M., & Khuriyah, K. (2023). Konsep dan implementasi kurikulum merdeka pada ranah rumpun mata pelajaran pendidikan Islam di Sekolah Dasar Islam Terpadu Al Hadi Mojolaban Sukoharjo. Modeling: Jurnal Program Studi PGMI, 10(2), 450-468.

Bergmark, U. (2020). Teachers’ professional learning when building a research-based education: Context-specific, collaborative and teacher-driven professional development. Professional Development in Education, 49(2), 210-224.

Campbell, E. (2012). Teacher agency in curriculum contexts. Curriculum Inquiry, 42(2), 183-190.

Cirocki, A., & Anam, S. U. (2024). ‘How much freedom do we have?’ The perceived autonomy of secondary school EFL teachers in Indonesia. Language Teaching Research, 28(2), 440-465.

Dieudé, A., & Prøitz, T. S. (2024). Curriculum policy and instructional planning: Teachers’ autonomy across various school contexts. European Educational Research Journal, 23(1), 28-47.

Ertem, H. Y., Arslan, A., & Ozenir Uren, E. (2021). The role of teacher autonomy and school climate on goal orientations for teaching. Psycho-Educational Research Reviews, 10(2), 203-212.

Fauzi, A. (2022). Implementasi kurikulum merdeka di sekolah penggerak. Jurnal Pahlawan. 18(2), 20-30.

Felayabi, H., Purnawarman, P., & Sukyadi, D. (2022). Autonomy practiced by English primary school teachers to develop teaching professionalism. Mimbar Sekolah Dasar, 9(1), 209-230.

Fifani, N. A., Safrizal, S., & Fadriati, F. (2023). Analisis kesulitan guru dalam penerapan kurikulum merdeka di SD Kota Batusangkar. Pendas Mahakam: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pembelajaran Sekolah Dasar, 8(1), 19-27.

Ford, T. G., Lavigne, A. L., Fiegener, A. M., & Si, S. (2020). Understanding district support for leader development and success in the accountability era: A review of the literature using social-cognitive theories of motivation. Review of Educational Research, 90(2), 264-307.

Haetami, A., Hamsiah, A., Hayati, N., & Pratiwi, E. Y. R. (2023). Pelatihan peningkatan kompetensi guru dalam implementasi Kurikulum Merdeka Belajar. Sabajaya: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat, 1(3), 173-179.

Kilag, O. K., Marquita, J., & Laurente, J. (2023). Teacher-led curriculum development: Fostering innovation in education. Excellencia: International Multi-disciplinary Journal of Education, 1(4), 223-237.

Lennert-DaSilva, A. L. (2022). Comparing teacher autonomy in different models of educational governance. Nordic Journal of Studies in Educational Policy, 8(2), 103-118.

Marzuki, M., & Indrawati, I. (2023). Teachers’ challenges in promoting learner autonomy. Pioneer: Journal of Language and Literature, 15(1), 119-137.

Miladiah, S. S., Sugandi, N., & Sulastini, R. (2023). Analisis penerapan kurikulum merdeka di SMP Bina Taruna Kabupaten Bandung. Jurnal Ilmiah Mandala Education, 9(1). 312-318.

Narayanan, M., Shields, A. L., & Delhagen, T. J. (2024). Autonomy in the spaces: Teacher autonomy, scripted lessons, and the changing role of teachers. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 56(1), 17-34.

Nguyen, D., Pietsch, M., & Gümüş, S. (2021). Collective teacher innovativeness in 48 countries: Effects of teacher autonomy, collaborative culture, and professional learning. Teaching and Teacher Education, 106(1), 1-16.

Oosterhoff, A., Oenema-Mostert, I., & Minnaert, A. (2020). Constrained or sustained by demands? Perceptions of professional autonomy in early childhood education. Contemporary Issues in Early Childhood, 21(2), 138-152.

Parcerisa, L., Verger, A., & Browes, N. (2022). Teacher autonomy in the age of performance-based accountability: A review based on teaching profession regulatory models (2017-2020). Education Policy Analysis Archives, 30(100), 1-29.

Parker, J. S., Parris, L., Lau, M., Dobbins, A., Shatz, L., Porush, S., & Wilkins, B. (2021). Perceived teacher autonomy support and self-determination skill expression: Predictors of student engagement among African American high school students. Journal of Black Psychology, 47(6), 445-475.

Poedjiastutie, D. (2019). A complex process of autonomy curriculum approach in Indonesia. Journal of Asia TEFL, 16(3), 1051-1065.

Pratycia, A., Putra, A. D., Salsabila, A. G. M., Adha, F. I., & Fuadin, A. (2023). Analisis perbedaan kurikulum 2013 dengan kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Sains dan Komputer, 3(1), 58-64.

Qotimah, I., & Rusman. (2024). Teacher efforts' to prepare implementation of kurikulum merdeka in elementary school. Inovasi Kurikulum, 21(1), 27-40.

Rarasati, N., & Pramana, R. P. (2023). Giving schools and teachers autonomy in teacher professional development under a medium- capability education system. RISE: Research on Improving System of Education Insight, 1(1), 1-10.

Razak, A. Z. A., Yasin, I. R., Abdullah, Z., Mustafa, W. A., & Risdianto, E. (2024). E-Learning application and teacher autonomy: A comprehensive review. Journal of Advanced Research in Applied Sciences and Engineering Technology, 57(2), 116-133.

Rifa’i, A. I., & Putra, N. D. (2024). Navigasi kesuksesan guru dan siswa di sekolah dasar dalam mengimplementasikan kurikulum merdeka. Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Madrasah Ibtidaiyah, 2(2), 66-74.

Tahirsylaj, A. (2019). Teacher autonomy and responsibility variation and association with student performance in Didaktik and curriculum traditions. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 51(2), 162-184.

Tokgoz-Can, M., & Bümen, N. T. (2021). Turkish teachers’ autonomy in using and adapting curriculum: A mixed methods study. Issues in Educational Research, 31(4), 1270-1292.

Wardati, L., Margolang, D., & Sitorus, S. (2023). Pembelajaran agama Islam berbasis moderasi beragama: Analisis kebijakan, implementasi dan hambatan. Fitrah: Journal of Islamic Education, 4(1), 175-187.

Yorulmaz, Y. İ., & Çolak, İ. (2023). Exploring teacher autonomy through teachers’ perspectives: a qualitative case study. Research on Education and Psychology, 7(2), 537-556.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i4.75491

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Khairil Azhar, Mohammad Ali, Eero Ropo, Dinn Wahyudin, Angga Hadiapurwa

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.


Inovasi Kurikulum
Published by Himpunan Pengembang Kurikulum Indonesia (HIPKIN)
in collaboration with Curriculum Development Study Program
Faculty of Education - Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia
Gedung FIP UPI Lt. 9 Jl. Dr. Setiabudhi Bandung 40154


Indexed By:

SINTA   GARUDA   Crossref      DOAJ DIMENSIONS BASE   ROAD

Google Scholar

Google Scholar p. ISSN 1829-6750 | Google Scholar e. ISSN 2798-1363