PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN KONTEKSTUAL TERHADAP HASIL BELAJAR
Abstract
Learning is an activity that can result in changes in a person, both actual and potential. Learning will be more meaningful if the child has learned what not to know. One of the methods that position the active role of students in this study is a method of contextual learning. Issues raised in this study is whether there are differences in initial test scores and final scores as well as differences in learning outcomes in the experimental class using contextual learning and classroom control using conventional methods. The design used in this study is a quasi experimental, Nonequivalent (Pretest and posttest) Control-Group Design on class VII SMP 4 Padalarang. The independent variables are contextual learning. The dependent variable is the student learning outcomes. Testing the difference of the average pretest and posttest score results using the t test at significance level α = 0.05, with a basis for decision making Ho is accepted if t <t table, otherwise the Ho is rejected if t count> t table. The result of the calculation is the average difference using t-test at α = 0.05, df 39 is obtained t = 6.773, whereas the t table = 11.099. Because it uses a two-sided test, the acceptance region is a table-t ≤ t ≤ t table. Meanwhile t (6.773) <t table (1.690), therefore the Ho = accepted. From the calculation of N-gain per class research 12.5% of students were high, 72.5% medium category and 15% lower category. From these calculations it can be concluded occur influence learning outcomes were greater in the experimental class than the control class. The conclusion of this study that there is a significant effect of contextual learning on learning outcomes as indicated by he change in the value of better learning outcomes than the value of the results of the previous study on class VII SMP 4 Padalarang
Keywords: Contextual Teaching and Learning, Learning Outcomes, Pretest, Posttest, N-Gain
Full Text:
PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)References
Mahfudin, A. (2009). Profesionalisme Jabatan Guru Di Era Globalisasi. Bandung: Rizqi Press.
Ningrum, E. (2009). Kompetensi Profesional Guru dalam Konteks Strategi Pembelajaran. Bandung: Buana Nusantara.
Nursisto. (2001). Spektrum Pengalaman Lapangan dalam Dunia Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
Romli, O (2010). Penerapan Pembelajaran Kontekstual untuk Meningkatkan Prestasi Belajar Matematika: Studi Eksperimen pada Siswa MA Negeri Pandeglang Kabupaten Pandeglang. Tesis. Tidak diterbitkan.
Rusman, (2008). Manajemen Kurikulum Seri Manajemen Sekolah Bermutu, Bandung: UPI Press.
Sanjaya, W. (2007). Strategi Pembelajaran Berorientasi Standar Proses Pendidikan. Jakarta: Kencana Prenada Media.
Sudjana, N. (1989). Dasar-Dasar Proses Belajar Mengajar. Bandung: Sinar Baru Algensindo.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2013). Pengembangan Kurikulum (Teori dan Praktek). Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya.
Sukmadinata, N. S. (2006). Metode Penelitian Pendidikan. Bandung: Remaja Rosdakarya
Sumaatmadja, N. (1997). Metodologi Pengajaran Geografi. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara.
Sumi’at. (2008). Upaya Pencapaian Kompetensi Dasar Membuat Dokumen Pengolah Angka dengan Variasi Teks, Tabel, Grafik, Gambar dan Diagram Melalui Model Penilaian Berbasis Portofolio (Penelitian Tindakan Kelas di Kelas XI.IPS.1 SMA Negeri 1 Gebog Kabupaten
Kudus). Tesis. Tidak diterbitkan.
Wibawa dan Mukti. (1992). Media Pendidikan. Jakarta: Depdiknas.
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v14i1.3358
DOI (PDF (Bahasa Indonesia)): https://doi.org/10.17509/gea.v14i1.3358.g2354
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2016 Hilman Latief
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.