Analysis of Information Technology User Behavior at Higher Education Institution holding BHMN status

Ratih Hurriyati, Lili Adi Wibowo

Abstract


This research assessment is conducted to predict the acceptance of internet technology at UPI’s academic society, using the Technology Acceptance Model or TAM, adding the social influence variable and self-efficacy, that become the antecedent of behavior other than TAM construct, such as perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. The research is descriptive and quantitative with the research method used descriptive survey and explanatory survey. Research subject consist of lecturer, students and academic staff at FBEP UPI, the sample size is 290 people taken by simple random sampling. The data analysis used is descriptive and quantitative analysis. Descriptive analysis used the frequency distribution and percentage through Likert Scale. The quantitative analysis used to test the hypothesis by means of Structural Equation Modeling. The result shows that respondent assessed internet usage is not difficult and can give benefit to reach their work performance. Respondents also think highly of their self efficacy in using the internet and gave medium response on social influence on their decision to use the internet. Respondents have high acceptance rate for internet usage, showing high interest in using it and high in actual implementation of usage. Attitude of internet usage is influenced mainly on perception of internet benefit and social influence. Interest to use the internet is influenced by self efficacy and social influence. Actual usage of internet is influenced mainly by the social influence. The positive attitude on internet usage has influence on actual internet usage through the interest variable.


Keywords


Technology Acceptance Model (TAM)

References


Ajzen, Ajzen dan Fishbein. (1969).” The Prediction of Behavioral Intentions in a Choice Situation”. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 5, 400 - 416.

Ajzen, Icek. (1993) “Attitude Theory and the Attitude-Behavior Relation.” In New Directions in Attitude Measurement (edited by Krebs, Dogmar & Schumidt, Peter), Walter de Gruyte. Berlin, New York, 41-57.

Arbaugh, J., (2000) "An Exploratory Study of Gender on Student Liming and Class Participation in an Internet-Based MBA Course ", Management Learning, Vol.34 (4), pp.503-519.

Arbucle, James L., dan Wothk, Warner, 1995-1999, AMOS 4, User Gauide, Small Water Corporation

Armitage, Cristopher J. dan Conner, Mark (1999) “The Theory of Planned Behavior: Assessment of Predictive Validity and 'Perceived Control',” British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 38, 35-54.

Bagozzi, Richrad P., Baungartner, Hans and Yi, Youjae, (1992), “State versus Action Orientation and the Theory of Reasoned Action: An Application to Coupon Usage,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18 , (March ), pp.505-518

Bagozzi,Richard R., (2000) “On the Concept of Intentional Social Action in Consumer Behavior”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 27, pp. 388-396.

Bentler, Peter M., & Speckart, George, (1981), “Attitudes “Cause” Behaviors: A Structural Equation Analysis”, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 40, No. 2, pp. 226-237.

Bruce, Harry, (1999), "Perceptions of the Internet: what people think when they search the Internet for Information" , Internet Research: Electronic Networking Applications and Policy, Vol. 9, No.3, pp.187-199.

Boyer, Kenneth K., Hallowell, Roger, dan Roth, Aleda, V., (2002) “E-services: operating strategy-a case study and a method for analyzyng operational benefits”, Journal of Operations Management, 20, pp. 175-188.

Chau, Patrick Y.K., & Hu, Paul Jen-Hwa, “Information Technology Acceptance by Individual Professionals: A Model Comparison Approach”, Decision Sciences, Vol. 32, No. 4, Fall. Pp. 699-719.

pp.91-98.

Conner, Mark, Sheeran, Pascal, Norman, Paul dan Armitage, Christopher J. (2000) “Temporal Stability as a Moderator Relationships in the Theory of Planned Behaviour,” British Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 39, pp. 469-493.

Davis, Fred D, Bagozzi, Ricard P. & Warshaw, Paul R. (1989), “User Acceptance of Computer Technology: A Comparison of Two Theoretical Models”, Management Science, Vol. 35, No. 8, pp. 982-1003.

Fishbein, Martin dan Ajzen, Icek (1975) Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior, Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Reading- Massachusetts

Howard, John A., dan Sheth, J. N., (1967), “Theory of Buyer Behavior,” Changing Market Systems, R. Moyer, pp. 253-262.

Igbaria, M, Zinatelli, Nancy, Cragg, Paul & Cavaye, Angele L.M. (1997), “Personal Computing Acceptance Factors in Small Firms: A Structural Equation Model”, MIS Quarterly, September, pp. 279-305.

Jogiyanto, Sistem Informasi Keperilakuan, Penerbit Andi Yogyakarta, 2007

Joreskog, Karl G., & Sorbom, Dag (1982) “Recent Developments in Strultural Equation Modeling, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. XIX (November), pp. 406-416.

Yogesh Malhotra & Dennis F. Galletta, Extending the Technology Acceptance Model to Account for Social Influence: Theoretical Bases and Empirical Validation Proceedings of the 32nd Hawaii International Conference on System Sciences - 1999

Venkatesh, Viswanath dan Fred D. Davis, (2000), “A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46, No. 2, pp. 186-204.

Venkatesh, Viswanath dan Davis, Fred D. (1996). “A Model of the Antecedents of Perceived Ease of Use: Development and Test.” Decision Sciences,27(3), 451-477.

Warshaw, Paul R., dan Davis, Fred D. 1985 “Disentangling Behavioral Intention and Behavioral Expectation, Journal of Expremental Social Psychology, 21, pp. 213-228.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/msb.v2i1.30355

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


View My Stats