The Evaluation of Narada Cup School Sport Program Using CIPP Evaluation Model

Rudy Pramono, Sarliyani Sarliyani, Agus Purwanto

Abstract


Narada Cup is one of the superior programs of the Narada Senior High School Student Council aimed at facilitating the development of student interests and talents and as a promotional event for the school. Considering the two big goals to be achieved and the plan to organize the next Narada Cup program, a comprehensive program evaluation process is needed to understand, explore, and improve the process of organizing it. This qualitative evaluation study used the CIPP evaluation model (context, input, process, product) with purposive sampling. The data collection was conducted through interview sessions, FGD (focus group discussion), observation, and documentation studies. This research results: (1) Context evaluation shows that formulating the vision and mission of the program will clarify the projections of long-term program objectives; (2) Input evaluation shows that the procurement of the manuals of implementation containing SOP (standard operational procedure) is needed; (3) Process evaluation concludes that the recording of the problem-solving process was used as an evaluation reference for all parties, so that the future implementation of the program would be better; (4) Product evaluations conclude that Narada Cup program is recommended to be continued annually and continuously evaluated and refined for the development and improvement of the quality of this program.


Abstrak

Piala Narada adalah salah satu program unggulan OSIS SMA Narada yang bertujuan memfasilitasi pengembangan minat dan bakat siswa dan sebagai acara promosi untuk sekolah. Mempertimbangkan dua tujuan besar yang ingin dicapai dan rencana untuk menyelenggarakan program Piala Narada berikutnya, proses evaluasi program diperlukan secara komprehensif untuk memahami, mengeksplorasi, dan meningkatkan proses pengorganisasian itu. Studi evaluasi kualitatif studi kasus ini menggunakan model evaluasi CIPP (konteks, input, proses, produk) dengan pengambilan sampel purposive dan pengumpulan data dilakukan melalui sesi wawancara, FGD (diskusi kelompok fokus), observasi, dan studi dokumentasi. Hasil penelitian ini: (1) Evaluasi konteks menunjukkan bahwa merumuskan visi dan misi program akan memperjelas proyeksi tujuan program jangka panjang. (2) Evaluasi input, pengadaan manual implementasi yang berisi SOP (prosedur operasional standar). (3) Evaluasi proses menyimpulkan bahwa rekaman proses penyelesaian masalah digunakan sebagai referensi evaluasi dengan semua pihak sehingga implementasi program di masa depan akan lebih baik.  (4) Evaluasi produk menyimpulkan bahwa program Piala Narada direkomendasikan untuk dilanjutkan setiap tahun dan terus dievaluasi dan disempurnakan untuk pengembangan dan peningkatan kualitas program ini


Keywords


CIPP evaluation model, Contextual leaning, Program evaluation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Arikunto, Suharismi & Cepi Safrudin Abdul Jabar. Evaluasi Program Pendidikan: Pedoman teoritis praktis bagi mahasiswa dan praktisi pendidikan. Jakarta: Bumi Aksara. 2014.

Davtyan, Ruzanna. Contextual Learning. ASEE 2014 Zone I Conference. University of Bridgeport, USA: April 3-5, 2014.

Hasnawati. "Pendekatan Contextual Teaching Learning Hubungannya dengan Evaluasi Pembelajaran". Jurnal Ekonomi & Pendidikan, Volume 3 Nomor 1, April 2006.

Hudson,Clemente Charles & Whisler, Vesta R. “Contextual Teaching and Learning for Practitioner”. Systemics, Cybernetic and Informatics, Volume 6 Number 4. ISSN: 1690-4524. 2008.

Mahmudi. CIPP: Suatu Model Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Jurnal At-Ta’dib, 6 (1). (2011).

Moleong, Lexy. J. Metodologi Penelitian Kualitatif. Bandung: Penerbit PT. Remaja Rosdakarya. 2014.

Mulyatiningsih, Endang. Riset Terapan Bidang Pendidkan & Teknik. Yogyakarta: UNY Press. 2011.

Rusdiana, H. A. Manajemen Evaluasi Program Pendidikan. Bandung: CV. Pustaka Setia. 2017.

Sallis, Edward. Total Quality Management in Education. USA:Stylus Publishing Inc. 2002.

Sari, Eliana, 2014, Menuju Indonesia Emas 2045:Peningkatan Kualitas Daya Saing Sumber Daya Manusia Melalui Manajmen Lingkungan Pendidikan, Prosiding Musyawarah Kerja APMAPI Dan Temu llmiah Nasional Manajemen Pendidikan 2014, Universitas Negeri Gorontalo.

Sears, Susan. Introduction to Contextual Teaching and Learning. Indiana: Phi Delta Kappa Educational foundation Bloomington. 2003.

Sudijono, Anas. Pengantar Evaluasi Pendidikan. Jakarta: Raja Grafindo Persada. 2015.

Sugiyono. Metode Penelitian Evaluasi: Pendekatan Kuantitatif, Kualitatif, dan Kombinasi. Bandung: Alfabeta. 2018.

Suryawati, Evi & Kamish Osman. “Contextual Learning: Innovative Approach towards the Development of Students’ Scientific Attitude and Natural Science Performance”. EURASIA Journal of Mathematics, Science and Technology Education 2018 14 (1): 61-76.

Stufflebeam, Daniel L. & Guili Zhang. The CIPP Evaluastion Model: How to evaluate for improvement and accountability. New York:The Guilford Press. 2017.

Stufflebeam DL, Shinkfield AJ. CIPP model for evaluation: An improvement/accountability approach. Evaluation Theory Model Appl. 2007:325-65.

Stufflebeam DL. CIPP Evaluation Model checklist 2007 [November 15, 2016]. Available from: http://wmich.edu/evalctr/checklists

Tayibnapis, Farida Yusuf. Evaluasi Program dan Instrumen Evaluasi untuk Program Pendidikan dan Penelitian. Jakarta: PT Rineka Cipta. 2008

_________, 2008, Peraturan Menteri Pendidikan Nasional Republik Indonesia Nomor 39 Tahun 2008 Tentang Pembinaan Kesiswaan




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpjo.v5i1.23516

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Rudy Pramono, Sarliyani Sarliyani, Agus Purwanto

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

web
statistics

View My Stats