Implementation of Structured Dyadic Methods to Improve Learning Results in Web and Mobile Device Programming Class XI Students in Software Engineering Expertise Program

Nur Helmi Akbar

Abstract


This research is a Classroom Action Research (CAR) to 36 students of class XI RPL SMK Negeri 4 Bandung. This study aims to improve learning outcomes in the subjects of Web Programming and Mobile Devices for class XI RPL students of SMK Negeri 4 Bandung for the 2020/2021 academic year through the application of the Structured Dyadic Method. The data collection technique is done by using learning result test, observation and documentation. The data analysis technique used is descriptive quantitative data analysis with a percentage in the form of calculating the learning outcomes test and the observation results. The results of this classroom action research are 1) cognitive learning outcomes increase, in cycle I the average cognitive score of students is 51.25 or 22 students have reached KKM. In the second cycle the average cognitive score of students increased to 83.75 or 36 students had reached the KKM. 2) The learning outcomes of students' affective domains increased, in the first cycle as many as 22 students had reached the very good or good category and increased to 33 students in the second cycle. 3) The students' psychomotor learning outcomes increased, in the first cycle as many as 28 students had reached the very good or good category and increased in the second cycle to 33 students. Therefore, it can be concluded that the application of the Structured Dyadic Method learning method can improve learning outcomes in the cognitive, affective and psychomotor domains of class XI RPL SMK Negeri 4 Bandung Academic Year 2020/2021.

Keywords


Affective; Cognitive; Learning outcomes; Psychomotor; Structured dyadic method.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Darsih, E. (2018). Learner-centered teaching: What makes it effective. Indonesian EFL Journal, 4(1), 33-42.

Intania, E. V., and Sutama, S. (2020). The role of character education in learning during the COVID-19 pandemic. Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Pendidikan, 13(2), 129-136.

Kurniati, I., and Surya, E. (2017). Students’ perception of their teacher teaching styles. International Journal of Sciences: Basic and Applied Research (IJSBAR), 33(2), 91-98.

Maba, W. (2017). Teacher's perception on the implementation of the assessment process in 2013 curriculum. International Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities, 1(2), 1-9.

Mascolo, M. F. (2009). Beyond student-centered and teacher-centered pedagogy: Teaching and learning as guided participation. Pedagogy and the Human Sciences, 1(1), 3-27.

Minamatov, Y. E. O. G. L., and Nasirdinova, M. H. Q. (2022). Application of ICT in education and teaching technologies. Scientific Progress, 3(4), 738-740.

Nasrallah, N., Rama, B., and Rahman, U. (2022). The application of behavioristic theory in the 2013 curriculum learning to shape the principles of students'characters. JICSA (Journal of Islamic Civilization in Southeast Asia), 11(1), 33-60.

Ratnasari, N., Kurniawati, K., and Syukur, A. (2020). Maximizing the implementation of scientific approach in history lessons through student-centered learning model. Journal of Education Research and Evaluation, 4(3), 234-239.

Yunus, S., and Eliastuti, M. (2020). Improvement of scientific writing ability through dyadic essay techniques. Lingua: Jurnal Ilmiah, 16(1), 45-57.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jgrkom.v2i2.63969

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.