Analysis of problem-solving ability: Pólya's strategy and positive attitude

Wenny Fitria; Rudi Susilana; Nanang Priatna

doi:10.17509/jik.v21i4.74803

Analysis of problem-solving ability: Pólya's strategy and positive attitude

Wenny Fitria, Rudi Susilana, Nanang Priatna

Abstract

Problem-solving is essential for individuals to face various challenges in the 21st century. Therefore, problem-solving has become a primary goal in mathematics curricula worldwide. However, despite its importance, problem-solving remains one of the most challenging aspects to grasp in mathematics education. Several studies have shown that appropriate strategies and a positive attitude toward problem-solving can help improve students' problem-solving abilities. In this study, the author will examine the implementation of Pólya's mathematical problem-solving strategy. Additionally, the study will explore students' attitudes toward problem-solving and how these attitudes influence their performance. Finally, the research will assess the combined impact of Pólya's strategy and students' attitudes on their problem-solving abilities. This study employs a qualitative approach using content analysis methods. The results show that the top ten students from one of the best schools in Siak Regency still struggle to solve simple problems. This failure is attributed to inappropriate strategies and a lack of a positive attitude toward problem-solving. The study concludes that mastering problem-solving strategies and fostering a positive attitude are crucial for students to become effective problem solvers.

Abstrak

Pemecahan masalah adalah keterampilan penting yang dibutuhkan individu untuk menghadapi berbagai tantangan di abad ke-21, sehingga menjadi tujuan utama dalam kurikulum matematika di banyak negara. Meskipun penting, aspek ini tetap menjadi bagian yang paling sulit dipahami dalam pendidikan matematika. Penelitian terdahulu menunjukkan bahwa secara terpisah, strategi yang tepat serta sikap positif terhadap pemecahan masalah, dapat meningkatkan kemampuan pemecahan masalah siswa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji penerapan strategi Pólya dalam pemecahan masalah matematika. Selain itu, penelitian ini juga akan mengeksplorasi sikap siswa terhadap pemecahan masalah dan bagaimana sikap tersebut mempengaruhi kinerja mereka. Akhirnya, penelitian ini akan menilai dampak gabungan dari strategi Pólya dan sikap siswa terhadap kemampuan pemecahan masalah mereka. Penelitian ini menggunakan pendekatan kualitatif dengan metode analisis konten. Hasilnya menunjukkan bahwa sepuluh siswa terbaik di salah satu sekolah terkemuka di Kabupaten Siak masih kesulitan menyelesaikan masalah sederhana. Kesulitan ini disebabkan oleh penggunaan strategi yang kurang tepat dan sikap positif yang rendah terhadap pemecahan masalah. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa penguasaan strategi pemecahan masalah dan pengembangan sikap positif secara bersamaan sangat penting agar siswa dapat menjadi pemecah masalah yang lebih efektif.

Kata Kunci: heuristic pólya; pemecahan masalah matematika; sikap positif.

Keywords

mathematical problem solving; pólya's heuristic; positive attitude

Full Text:

Download PDF (English)

References

Ahdhianto, E., Marsigit, H., & Nurfauzi, Y. (2020). Improving fifth-grade students’ Mathematical problem-solving and critical thinking skills using problem-based learning. Universal Journal of Educational Research, 8(5), 2012-2021.

Aiken, L. R. (1970). Attitudes toward mathematics. Review of Educational Research, 40(4), 551-596.

Akbari, O., & Sahibzada, J. (2020). Students’ self-confidence and its impacts on their learning process. American International Journal of Social Science Research, 5(1), 1-15.

Aydoğdu, M., & Ayaz, M. F. (2008). The importance of problem solving in Mathematics curriculum. E-Journal of New World Sciences Academy, 3(4), 538-545.

Bakker, A., Cai, J., & Zenger, L. (2021). Future themes of Mathematics education research: An international survey before and during the pandemic. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 107(1), 1-24.

Berger, N., Mackenzie, E., & Holmes, K. (2020). Positive attitudes towards Mathematics and Science are mutually beneficial for student achievement: A latent profile analysis of TIMSS 2015. The Australian Educational Researcher, 47(3), 409-444.

Bilad, M. R., Zubaidah, S., & Prayogi, S. (2024). Addressing the PISA 2022 results: A call for reinvigorating Indonesia’s education system. International Journal of Essential Competencies in Education, 3(1), 1-12.

Blum, W. (2015). Quality teaching of Mathematical modelling: What do we know, what can we do?. The International Congress on Mathematical Education, 12(1), 73-96.

Blum, W., & Niss, M. (1991). Applied Mathematical problem solving, modelling, applications, and links to other subjects — State, trends and issues in mathematics instruction. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 22(1), 37-68.

Burkhardt, H. (2014). Curriculum design and systemic change. Mathematics Curriculum in School Education, 1, 1-17.

Chen, Y. C., & Techawitthayachinda, R. (2021). Developing deep learning in Science classrooms: Tactics to manage epistemic uncertainty during whole‐class discussion. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(8), 1083-1116.

Creswell, J. W., Hanson, W. E., Clark Plano, V. L., & Morales, A. (2007). Qualitative research designs: Selection and implementation. The Counseling Psychologist, 35(2), 236-264.

Eccles, J. S., & Jacobs, J. E. (1986). Social forces shape math attitudes and performance. Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 11(2), 367-380.

Fitria, W., & Sukirman, D. (2023). The effectiveness socialization of the kurikulum merdeka independently change in high schools Siak District. Inovasi Kurikulum, 20(1), 13-24.

Fülöp, É. (2021). Developing problem-solving abilities by learning problem-solving strategies: An exploration of teaching intervention in authentic mathematics classes. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 65(7), 1309-1326.

Garofalo, J., & Lester, F. K. (1985). Metacognition, cognitive monitoring, and Mathematical performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 16(3), 163-176.

Haddaway, N. R., Bethel, A., Dicks, L. V., Koricheva, J., Macura, B., Petrokofsky, G., ... & Stewart, G. B. (2020). Eight problems with literature reviews and how to fix them. Nature Ecology & Evolution, 4(12), 1582-1589.

Halmos, P. R. (1980). The heart of Mathematics. American Mathematical Monthly, 87(7), 519-524.

Han, S., & Hwang, J. (2023). Exploring Mathematical modeling in classrooms: Insights from diverse studies. Research in Mathematical Education, 26(3), 121-125.

Hang, L. T., & Van, V. H. (2020). Building strong teaching and learning strategies through teaching innovations and learners' creativity: A study of Vietnam Universities. International Journal of Education and Practice, 8(3), 498-510.

Hannula, M. S., Maijala, H., & Pehkonen, E. (2004). Development of understanding and self-confidence in mathematics grades 5-8. Proceedings of the 28th Conference of the International Group for the Psychology of Mathematics Education, 3(1), 17-24.

John, C., & Edwin, C. (2009). Problem solving style, creative thinking, and problem solving confidence. Educational Research Quarterly, 33(1), 18-30.

Jonassen, D. H. (1997). Instructional design models for well-structured and ill-structured problem-solving learning outcomes. Educational Technology Research and Development, 45(1), 65-94.

Kaiser, G. (2017). The teaching and learning of Mathematical modeling. Compendium for Research in Mathematics Education, 267(1), 267-291.

Kaur, B. (1997). Difficulties with problem solving in Mathematics. The Mathematics Educator, 2(1), 93-112.

Khaira, H. S., Al Hafizh, M. F., Darmansyah, P. S. A., Nugraha, H., & Komara, D. A. (2023). Analysis of needs and teachers' perception towards business teaching materials at SMA Labschool UPI. Curricula: Journal of Curriculum Development, 2(2), 299-314.

Lester, F. & Cai, J. (2016). Can mathematical problem solving be taught? preliminary answers from 30 years of research. Posing and Solving Mathematical Problems, 1, 117-135.

Ling, A. N. B., & Mahmud, M. S. (2023). Challenges of teachers when teaching sentence-based mathematics problem-solving skills. Frontiers in Psychology, 13(1), 1-11.

London, M., Sessa, V. I., & Shelley, L. A. (2023). Developing self-awareness: Learning processes for self-and interpersonal growth. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 10(1), 261-288.

McKenney, S., & Reeves, T. C. (2021). Educational design research: Portraying, conducting, and enhancing productive scholarship. Medical education, 55(1), 82-92.

Michener, E. R. (1978). Understanding Mathematics. Cognitive Science, 2(4), 361-383.

Olivares, D., Lupiáñez, J. L., & Segovia, I. (2021). Roles and characteristics of problem solving in the Mathematics curriculum: A review. International Journal of Mathematical Education in Science and Technology, 52(7), 1079-1096.

Rahman, M. (2019). 21st century skill “problem solving”: defining the concept. Asian Journal of Interdisciplinary Research, 2(1), 64-74.

Rosyiddin, A. A. Z., Fiqih, A., Hadiapurwa, A., Nugraha, H., & Komara, D. A. (2023). The effect of interactive PowerPoint media design on student learning interests. Edcomtech: Jurnal Kajian Teknologi Pendidikan, 8(1), 12-24.

Sadler-Smith, E. (2015). Wallas’ four-stage model of the creative process: more than meets the eye?. Creativity Research Journal, 27(4), 342-352.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (1979). Explicit heuristic training as a variable in problem-solving performance. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 10(3), 173-187.

Schoenfeld, A. H. (2010). Bharath sriraman and lyn english: Theories of Mathematics education (seeking new frontiers). ZDM: The International Journal on Mathematics, 42(5), 503-506.

Silver, E., Ghousseini, H., Gosen, D., Charalambous, C., & Strawhun, B. (2005). Moving from rhetoric to praxis: Issues faced by teachers in having students consider multiple solutions for problems in the mathematics classroom. The Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3), 287-301.

Silver, E., Leung, S., & Cai, J. (1995). Generating multiple solutions for a problem: A comparison of the responses of U.S. and Japanese students. Educational Studies in Mathematics, 28(1), 35-54.

Singh, K., Granville, M., & Dika, S. (2002). Mathematics and science achievement: Effects of motivation, interest, and academic engagement. The Journal of Educational Research, 95(6), 323-332.

Skaalvik, E. M., & Rankin, R. J. (1995). A test of the internal/external frame of reference model at different levels of Math and verbal self-perception. American Educational Research Journal, 32(1), 161-184.

Smith, R., Snow, P., Serry, T., & Hammond, L. (2021). The role of background knowledge in reading comprehension: A critical review. Reading Psychology, 42(3), 214-240.

Stacey, K. (2005). The place of problem solving in contemporary mathematics curriculum documents. Journal of Mathematical Behavior, 24(3-4), 341-350.

Szabo, Z. K., Körtesi, P., Guncaga, J., Szabo, D., & Neag, R. (2020). Examples of problem-solving strategies in mathematics education supporting the sustainability of 21st-century skills. Sustainability (Switzerland), 12(23), 1-28.

Tambychik, T., & Meerah, T. S. M. (2010). Students’ difficulties in mathematics problem-solving: What do they say?. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 8(5), 142-151.

Topal, K., & Yenmez, A. A. (2024). Students' Mathematical literacy in the process of teaching problem solving strategies. Anadolu Üniversitesi Eğitim Fakültesi Dergisi, 8(3), 1040-1066.

Wen, R., & Dubé, A. K. (2022). A systematic review of secondary students’ attitudes towards Mathematics and its relations with Mathematics achievement. Journal of Numerical Cognition, 8(2), 295-325.

Zheng, X., Flynn, L. J., & Swanson, H. L. (2013). Experimental intervention studies on word problem solving and math disabilities: A selective analysis of the literature. Learning Disability Quarterly, 36(2), 97-111.

DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jik.v21i4.74803