Dawn of a New Era: History of Uzbekistan's Higher Education System Transforms with Matrix Management
Abstract
This research explores the impact of the transition to matrix management within history Uzbekistan's higher education system, marking a significant shift in its administrative and operational paradigm. The study posits that the adoption of matrix management will engender a range of positive outcomes. This approach uses a mixed-methods design with descriptive methods. Firstly, the author hypothesizes that the shift will improve operational efficiency through better resource allocation and interdepartmental collaboration. This is anticipated due to matrix management's inherently flexible structure, allowing for more dynamic resource utilization and encouraging cross-functional teamwork. This research suggests that this transformation will lead to heightened job satisfaction among faculty and staff. Matrix management, with its emphasis on open communication and collaborative decision-making, is expected to create a more engaged and motivated workforce. The results of this study could potentially inform other sectors in history Uzbekistan and other nations grappling with similar educational challenges, particularly those seeking to improve efficiency, innovation, and stakeholder satisfaction within their systems. This research underscores the significance of administrative and managerial strategies in transforming the higher education landscape, paving the way for future educational excellence.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
ABDURAKHMANOV, K. K., KHAKIMOV, N. K., RUZIEVA, R. H., MAKHMUTKHODJAEVA, L. S., & TOZHALIEV, A. A. (2019). Higher education as a significant factor of Uzbekistan’s sustainable development. Revista Espacios, 40(09).
Kates, A., & Galbraith, J. R. (2007). Designing your organization: Using the star model to solve 5 critical design challenges. John Wiley & Sons.
Rogers, E. M. (2003). Diffusion of innovations (5th ed.). Free Press.
Davis, K. (1968). Job satisfaction, job involvement, and purpose in life. Journal of Applied Psychology, 52(4), 396-400.
Locke, E. A. (1976). The nature and causes of job satisfaction. In M. D. Dunnette (Ed.), Handbook of Industrial and Organizational Psychology (pp. 1297–1349). Chicago: Rand McNally.
Rogers, E. M. (1983). Diffusion of Innovations. (3rd ed.). New York: The Free Press.
Burns, T. E., & Stalker, G. M. (1961). The Management of Innovation. University of Illinois at Urbana-Champaign’s Academy for Entrepreneurial Leadership Historical Research Reference in Entrepreneurship. SSRN.
Galbraith, J. R. (1971). Matrix organization designs How to combine functional and project forms. Business Horizons. https://doi.org/10.1016/0007-6813(71)90037-1
Gibson, C. B., & Birkinshaw, J. (2004). The antecedents, consequences, and mediating role of organizational ambidexterity. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.2307/20159573
Herzberg, F. (1968). One More Time: How Do You Motivate Your Employees. Hbr.
Herzberg, F., Mausner, B., & Snyderman, B. B. (1959). The Motivation to Work - With a New Introduction by Frederick Herzberg. New Brunswick, NJ Transaction Publishers.
Katz, D., & Kahn, R. L. (1978). The Social Psychology of Organizations (Chapter 13). In The Social Psychology of Organizations.
Katz, R. (1982). The Effects of Group Longevity on Project Communication and Performance. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392547
Knight, K. E. (1967). A Descriptive Model of the Intra-Firm Innovation Process. The Journal of Business. https://doi.org/10.1086/295013
Larson, E. W., & Gobeli, D. H. (1987). Matrix Management: Contradictions and Insights. California Management Review. https://doi.org/10.2307/41162135
Leonard, D., & Leonard-Barton, D. (1995). Wellsprings of knowledge: Building and sustaining the sources of innovation. In Boston: Harvard Business School.
Medcof, J. W. (2001). Resource-based strategy and managerial power in networks of internationally dispersed technology units. Strategic Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.1002/smj.192
Mintzberg, H. (1993). Structure in Fives-Designing effective organizations. Prentice-Hall International.
Nonaka, I., & Takeuchi, H. (1995). Knowledge-Creating Company. Knowledge-Creating Company.
Rousseau, D. M. (1978). Characteristics of Departments, Positions, and Individuals: Contexts for Attitudes and Behavior. Administrative Science Quarterly. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392578
Scully, J. A., Kirkpatrick, S. A., & Locke, E. A. (1995). Locus of knowledge as a determinant of the effects of participation on performance, affect, and perceptions. Academy of Management Journal, 38(2), 579-600. https://doi.org/10.1006/obhd.1995.1022
Skyttner, L. (2006). General systems theory: Problems, perspectives, practice. In General Systems Theory: Problems, Perspectives, Practice. https://doi.org/10.1142/5871
Sy, T., & D’Annunzio, L. S. (2005). Challenges and Strategies of Matrix Organizations. Human Resource Planning.
Tan, S. K., Fauziah, W., Yusoff, W., Kian, T. S., Talha, M., & Idris, M. (201 C.E.). Herzberg ’ s Two-Factor Theory on Work Motivation : Does it Works for Todays Environment ? herzberg two factor theory on work motivation: does its. Global Journal of Management Perspective.
Tidd, J., & Bassant, J. (2013). Managing innovation; integrating technological, market and organizational change, 5th ed. (online access included). Reference & Research Book News VO - 28.
Von Bertalanffy, L. (1972). The History and Status of General Systems Theory. Academy of Management Journal. https://doi.org/10.5465/255139
DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/jpis.v32i2.61841
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.