Librarians’ Perceptions About Adoption and Uses of The Integrated Library Software

N. G.D.A. Jayarathna, H. M.M.N. Herath

Abstract


The main objective of this study was to investigate the factors that influenced the adoption of Koha-integrated library software by librarians in Sri Lankan universities and libraries and to examine the challenges that were encountered during the implementation process. Additionally, the study aimed to evaluate the librarians' perceptions of Koha's performance in Sri Lankan libraries. To gather data, a survey was conducted among a purposive sample of 75 university librarians in Sri Lanka. The results showed that librarians were attracted to Koha due to its multilingual support, desirable features, and functionality, popularity among professionals, and provision of the MARC 21 standard for cataloging. However, during the implementation process, librarians faced several challenges, including a lack of knowledge about operating systems, the complex process of migrating data from legacy systems, a lack of technical skills, and the need for a highly networked and integrated environment. Despite these challenges, the study found that librarians were generally satisfied with Koha's performance, particularly in the areas of circulation, cataloging, OPAC, and patron modules. The findings of this study can provide valuable insights for librarians who are considering implementing or using Koha in their libraries.

Keywords


Integrated library software; Koha; Library automation software; Library management systems; Sri Lanka

Full Text:

PDF

References


Egunjobi, R. A., and Awoyemi, R. A. (2012). Library automation with Koha. Library Hi Tech News, 29(3), 12-15.

Gireesh Kumar, T. K. (2017). Transition from closed to open: Case of integrated library automation software in India. Informatics Studies, 4(4), 13-21.

Jamogha, E., Jamogha, O., and Efosa-Isibor, S. O. (2021a). Availability and utilisation of library information resources by students in selected secondary schools in Ondo west local government area, Ondo State, Nigeria. Library Philosophy and Practice, 2021,1-16.

Jamogha, E., Owoeye, J., and Godwin, L. S. (2021b). Perceived usefulness and adoption of Koha integrated library systems by librarians in universities in Southern Nigeria. Digital Library Perspectives, 38(1), 55–68.

Keast, D. (2011). A survey of Koha in Australian special libraries: Open source brings new opportunities to the outback. OCLC Systems and Services: International digital library perspectives, 27(1), 23-39.

Khan, M. T., Zahid, A., and Rafiq, M. (2016). Journey from library management system (LMS) to Koha by government college university libraries, Lahore. Pakistan Journal of Information Management and Libraries, 17(1), 184-190.

Khan, S. A., and Ayesha, G. (2022). Key features of information management systems (IMSs) for automation in university libraries: A view point of information professionals in Pakistan. Library Hi Tech, 40(6), 1606-1626.

Madhusudhan, M., and Singh, V. (2016). Integrated library management systems: Comparative analysis of Koha, Libsys, NewGenLib, and Virtua. The Electronic Library, 34(2), 223–249.

Mahmood, K. (1999). The development of computerised library services in Pakistan: A review of the literature. Asian Libraries, 8(9), 307-328.

Mairaj, M. I., and El-Hadi, W. M. (2012). Applications of information and communication technologies in libraries in Pakistan. Journal of the Medical Library Association: JMLA, 100(3), 218-222.

Makori, E. O., and Osebe, N. M. (2016). Koha enterprise resource planning system and its potential impact on information management organizations. Library Hi Tech News, 33(4), 17-23.

Omeluzor, S. U., Adara, O., Ezinwayi, M., Bamidele, A. I., and Umahi, F. O. (2012). Implementation of Koha integrated library management software (ILMS): the Babcock University experience. Canadian Social Science, 8(4), 211-221.

Shafi-Ullah, F., and Qutab, S. (2012). From LAMP to Koha: Case study of the Pakistan legislative assembly libraries. Program: Electronic Library and Information Systems, 46(1), 43–55.

Singh, M., and Sanaman, G. (2012). Open source integrated library management systems: Comparative analysis of Koha and NewGenLib. The Electronic Library, 30(6), 809–832.

Tella, A., Dina, N., Olaniyi, O. T., Memudu, S. A., and Oguntayo, S. A. (2017). Assessment of the use of koha library software in four selected university libraries in Nigeria. Journal of Applied Information Science and Technology, 10(2), 1-15.

Todd, C. R. (2017). Librarian as data migrator: A functional pathway from Millennium to Koha. Digital Library Perspectives, 34(1), 60–69.

Walls, I. (2011). Migrating from Innovative Interfaces’ Millennium to Koha: The NYU health sciences libraries’ experiences. OCLC Systems and Services: International Digital Library Perspectives, 27(1), 51–56.




DOI: https://doi.org/10.17509/ijert.v4i2.65592

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.

View My Stats
Indonesian Journal of Educational Research and Technology (IJERT) is published by Universitas Pendidikan Indonesia (UPI)